My Perspective on the Argument for “Alien Malevolence”
Recently, a discussion arose on another social media platform regarding claims of extraterrestrial malevolence, sparked by Tom Delonge’s comments about potentially deploying nuclear weapons against “ETs.” This conversation included allegations of alien abductions, cattle mutilations, dangerous technology transfers, and DNA manipulation. Here’s my take on these claims.
- Abductions: I acknowledge that some people report being taken from their surroundings against their will and subjected to encounters with extraterrestrial beings. One widely known case is that of Travis Walton, who, after approaching a UFO, was hit by an energy blast, resulting in significant injury. He was later returned after being treated by a non-human intelligence (NHI) and has expressed gratitude for this healing.
Another example comes from the Foundation for Research into ET and Extraordinary Encounters (FREE) Experiencer Survey. A woman, using the pseudonym “Shannon,” reported over 25 years of involuntary interactions with grey-skinned entities, during which she underwent biological evaluations. Despite the intrusive nature of these experiences, Shannon developed a bond with one of the beings, feeling reassured by it over time, which led her to perceive them as family.
Shannon’s case is detailed in Chapter 6 of FREE’s book, “Beyond UFOs,” which I co-authored with Preston Dennett. After suffering for two decades from chronic fatigue syndrome, Shannon was healed by the same entities she encountered after seeking assistance from a channeler. She described a painful procedure during a subsequent encounter, but awoke completely cured afterward.
While I recognize that some individuals may genuinely experience trauma from these encounters, it’s important to note that many “abductee” experiences lack substantial evidence of physical abduction; few are documented thoroughly, such as through video or police reports. I propose the term “Unsolicited Psychic Interaction” (UPI) as a more fitting label when no physical evidence is available. Unfortunately, such terminology might not find traction in popular culture or within UFO discussions.
Despite this, a significant portion of those who report encounters, nearly 85 to 90 percent per our survey findings, describe their experiences as neutral or positive, and often wish to continue them.
-
Cattle Mutilations: This phenomenon terrifies the public and poses a threat to ranchers. I suspect that only a fraction of these incidents are possibly perpetrated by covert military units; the rest may be linked to NHIs, who allegedly examine animals for radiation and toxins, potentially for research purposes. If true, this activity doesn’t inherently suggest malevolence, especially when contrasted with the millions of animals slaughtered for food in inhumane conditions.
-
Technology Transfers: Claims of alleged collaborations between extraterrestrial entities and military officials have circulated for decades, with some citing Nazi-engineered flying saucer designs as proof. However, I find the lack of credible eyewitness testimony from reputable scientists, such as Werner von Braun and other former Nazi engineers involved in US space technology, leaves these allegations lacking in substance. What seems to persist is a myth that fuels a culture of fear and mistrust.
-
Genome Modification: Discussions around alleged ET-human hybrid programs surfaced at a conference I attended in March 2019, often presented as fact. While NHIs may possess advanced bioengineering capabilities, credible sources for hybridization claims predominantly come from channelers or hypnotized experiencers, a method notorious for producing false memories. The influence of suggestibility can distort testimonies to fit subjective narratives. Even if these experiences hold some truth, I regard them with skepticism, as UFO intelligences may be intentionally misleading in our communications.
My concern is that by not effectively countering the notion of ET malevolence and being open to the potential for misconceptions, we risk enabling narratives that promote conflict. The sensationalism surrounding UFOs is profitable for many, but we risk ignoring the more
Your thoughtful response raises important points about the complexities and nuances surrounding the discourse on extraterrestrial (ET) encounters. The cases you present illustrate the range of human experiences and perceptions regarding abductions and interactions with alleged non-human intelligences (NHIs).
Abduction Experiences: You highlight the dichotomy between physical abductions and what you term “Unsolicited Psychic Interaction” (UPI). This distinction opens an avenue for exploring the psychological and emotional impacts of such experiences without immediately labeling them as malevolent or harmful. It’s crucial to create a space for individuals to share their narratives without fear of stigma, as a significant percentage report positive or neutral experiences. This insight challenges the overly simplistic portrayal of all abductions as inherently traumatic.
Cattle Mutilations: Your assertion that many of these incidents might be connected to non-human research rather than malicious intent is a refreshing perspective. As you note, the framing of this issue should consider the broader context of animal treatment across industries. Recognizing the potential for NHIs to engage in study for understanding ecological impacts offers a more compassionate view on these unsettling occurrences.
Technology Transfers: The call for credible evidence and testimony regarding alleged ET collaborations with military entities is essential. Speculation without substantiating data only deepens the mythos surrounding ufology and hinders constructive discussion. Investigating these claims rigorously may prove to be more productive than relying on conjecture or anecdotal narratives that often lack grounding in reality.
Genome Modification: Your skepticism regarding the narratives surrounding hybridization is valid, especially in light of concerns about the reliability of self-reported experiences under hypnosis. It’s important to maintain a critical approach when evaluating such claims and to distinguish between what is perceived and what can be substantiated through empirical evidence.
Your call for a balanced perspective that resists the urge to sensationalize ET encounters is crucial. Cultivating a mindset that favors dialogue, understanding, and potential collaboration with NHIs rather than fear and hostility may pave the way for a more positive future. Engaging in these conversations can foster a sense of unity and purpose among disclosure activists, ultimately steering the narrative away from conflict and towards cooperation.
Addressing fear-based myths and unfounded accusations of malevolence supports a broader understanding of what it means to engage with the unknown, particularly in our evolving perception of UAP. As you rightly point out, the potential for future discourse and collaboration could shape the fabric of interstellar relations, should they become a reality. Thank you for sharing your insightful reflections on this pressing topic.