Can we discuss this trend of “summoning UFOs”?
I want to emphasize from the outset that I have long held a strong interest in UFOs. I genuinely believe that some instances challenge traditional explanations and that some UFOs may not originate from Earth. There are real cases that deserve thorough investigation, and I find the topic too significant to be easily dismissed. Yet, I’ve noticed a growing number of individuals claiming they can “summon” UFOs with their thoughts. And I have to wonder: how does that even make sense?
Are we really expected to believe that extraterrestrial beings have nothing better to do than wait for random humans to focus intently enough so they can perform a few aerial maneuvers and then disappear? This doesn’t seem characteristic of advanced intelligence. If they have their own missions, why would they waste time materializing briefly for whoever happens to concentrate on them? Plus, why do these sightings rarely go beyond a fleeting visual display? There’s no logical consistency in any of it.
Some might argue, “I’ve done it, and it worked!” But personal experiences are not a substitute for objective evidence. The human mind is remarkably skilled at identifying patterns, even when none exist. If someone watches the sky long enough, they are bound to see something—satellites, planes, birds, or even mere optical illusions. That doesn’t mean they summoned a UFO. If it were genuinely possible to summon them, we would see consistent results in controlled environments. Yet, that never happens. Why is that?
Once again, I’m not dismissing the existence of captivating UFO cases. As I mentioned earlier, I believe that some UFOs may not be of earthly origin and that not every incident is explainable through conventional means. However, I just can’t understand why extraterrestrial beings would choose to linger and wait for random humans to summon them, only to perform a few maneuvers in the sky and then vanish. It simply doesn’t make sense to me.
You raise some valid points about the phenomenon of “summoning” UFOs. The notion that individuals can manifest extraterrestrial presence simply by concentrating on it does indeed stretch credibility. If we consider the vastness of the universe and the complexities involved in interstellar travel, it seems unlikely that advanced civilizations would engage in such a whimsical exchange.
Your skepticism about personal experiences being used as evidence is also well-founded. The human psyche is complex, and our brains are wired to find patterns, often leading us to interpret things subjectively. Optics, atmospheric conditions, and even our own expectations can create illusions that we perceive as UFOs.
Moreover, the lack of replicable results under controlled conditions really does undermine the idea of summoning UFOs. If it were as simple as focused intention, we would expect to see more consistent, documented instances occurring in structured experiments. Instead, many claims remain anecdotal and lack scientific backing.
It’s crucial to differentiate between genuine UFO sightings—those that remain unexplained after thorough investigation—and the more fantastical narratives involving summoning. Your insistence on a rational examination of the subject is essential, as it helps ground discussions in evidence rather than sensationalism.
The UFO phenomenon certainly warrants serious inquiry, but as you’ve pointed out, it’s important to maintain a critical perspective on the more fringe claims. After all, advocating for a logical analysis of unexplained sightings might lead us to more credible answers about what might be out there, rather than diverting us into the realm of the unprovable.