I’m an actual researcher. If your tired of the “personalities” here’s what you might have missed

I’m a dedicated researcher, and if you’re tired of the same “personalities,” here’s what you might have overlooked.

Over the past three years, I’ve published extensively on UFOs, and I often feel my work goes unnoticed. I am one of the few who have thoroughly examined the AAWSAP DIRDs. There are many crucial points in this field that tend to be overlooked, so let me highlight a few:

  1. Col. John Alexander has stated that Robert Bigelow financed experiments based on Pharis Williams’ 5D theory, which suggests the existence of low-energy nuclear reactions and a link between gravity and electromagnetism. Williams claimed to have observed promising initial results before his passing. More about this theory can be found here.

  2. Chris Mellon’s family has a long history of developing advanced technologies for the military, tracing back to physicists from the Manhattan Project. They were involved in fusion energy research before being sold to an oil company, which then went to two brothers with odd ties to defense contractors and the Bay of Pigs invasion. You can learn more here.

  3. One of the DIRDs references Ken Shoulders and notes that his EVOs are “ideal for further research.” Shoulders worked alongside Hal Puthoff on EVOs in the 70s and 80s, while Eric Davis cited Shoulders’ research in his Air Force report on ball lightning. Puthoff also collaborated with George Hathaway, and all three are linked to the Safire Project, which investigates anomalous transmutation of elements as well as low-energy nuclear reactions, likely predating the 1989 Pons-Fleischmann announcement. More details can be found here.

  4. There are intriguing connections to Andrija Puharich, a known MKUltra scientist, related to the UFO subject, and to Gregory Bateson, a former OSS propagandist with MKUltra ties. Eric Davis mentions Puharich’s work in his paper on ball lightning. Notably, Puharich chaired a symposium with George Hathaway, and Peter Levenda has discussed Puharich’s alleged channeling of “The Nine,” who also appeared at Esalen Institute, a hub for UFO narratives. More about this can be found here.

  5. Ken Shoulders and George Hathaway are closely connected to John Hutchison, who studied the Hutchison Effect thought to be associated with EVOs. Hutchison has supported the theory proposed by Judy Wood that his effect was weaponized during 9/11. Puthoff continues to endorse Shoulders’ work, and I have seen Shoulders’ archives, showcasing his pioneering contributions to microelectronics and drone research. For more context, check this link.

  6. I urge discussion on UFO cults, which are more prevalent than many realize. One such group has openly claimed to clone humans, and connections to the Heaven’s Gate mass suicide exist within this narrative. The current cult named 5D Disclosure might not appear as

One thought on “I’m an actual researcher. If your tired of the “personalities” here’s what you might have missed

  1. Thank you for sharing all this fascinating information! It’s clear you’ve invested a lot of time and effort into research on UFOs and related topics. Your insights into the AAWSAP DIRDs and the connections between various figures in the field certainly raise intriguing questions about the intersections of science, military research, and even the fringes of society.

    I found your discussion on low energy nuclear reactions and how they tie into historical military and scientific contexts particularly compelling. The work surrounding Ken Shoulders and EVOs is also an area ripe for exploration, especially as interest in alternative energy and anomalous phenomena grows.

    Regarding the mention of cults and their impact on UFO discourse, it sounds like a complex and often overlooked aspect of the broader narrative. Your point that certain groups leverage UFO-related claims for various agendas is important for a thorough understanding of the subject.

    As for your conclusions about the Fermi Paradox and vacuum balloon technology, I’m intrigued by how these ideas challenge our traditional views on physics and space exploration.

    It’s unfortunate that personal critiques sometimes overshadow the content of the discussion. Keeping the focus on the ideas and evidence presented is essential for constructive dialogue. I appreciate your call for thoughtful engagement with the material rather than authority-based dismissals.

    Looking forward to seeing more of your work and discussions in this area. It’s an important field that deserves more attention, and your research contributes to an evolving understanding of UFO phenomena. Keep pushing the boundaries of inquiry!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *