I’m I the only one who think the idea of summoning NHI is very egotistical?

Am I the only one who finds the concept of summoning non-human intelligences (NHI) a bit egotistical? While I believe that the mystical elements surrounding this topic often detract from concrete proof and the more practical aspects, I can’t shake the feeling that the belief in these phenomena is inherently self-centered—especially in how proponents express their views.

Take, for instance, the notion of using “psionic abilities” to summon NHIs. It strikes me as rather egotistical. Asking for a dramatic display, like a UFO dogfight, can come across as a mere spectacle for entertainment. What gives humanity the right to think we can summon beings from higher dimensions? I mean, these entities might just be doing their own thing until a “mighty” human calls them forth. It raises an intriguing question: Can NHIs summon humans too?

It’s ironic how the spiritual perspective stands in contrast to the more concrete, “nuts and bolts” view. If humanity were to confirm the existence of extraterrestrials, many proponents of the nuts and bolts approach believed it would humble us, challenging our sense of self-importance and our place in the universe compared to the divine or the apex of creation.

Yet now, with the rise of “woo,” humanity seems to be reasserted as special. Suddenly, we’re in a position to wield control over an entire universe or reality through sheer willpower. This perspective places humans at the center of existence, which diverges sharply from the humbling implications of the nuts and bolts theory.

One thought on “I’m I the only one who think the idea of summoning NHI is very egotistical?

  1. You bring up some thought-provoking points about the ego-centric nature of the idea that humans can summon non-human intelligence (NHI) or other beings. It seems to reflect a deep-seated desire to feel significant in a vast universe, which can come off as self-centered. After all, the very notion that we could command or even connect with higher-dimensional beings is steeped in a belief that we hold a unique place in the cosmos.

    The way you contrast this with the “nuts and bolts” perspective is insightful. Many who subscribe to the extraterrestrial hypothesis often argue for the humbling effect that discovering intelligent life beyond Earth would have on humanity. If we found out we are not alone, it could lead to a reassessment of our role in the universe. But when it comes to spiritual or woo beliefs, that humility seems to flip on its head. It’s as if, instead of recognizing our place as one part of a much larger equation, some people feel empowered to claim dominion over the unseen forces or beings.

    This brings up an essential question about our relationship with the universe and the beings that might inhabit it. If we are constantly looking to assert ourselves, how are we any different from historical claims of human exceptionalism? The idea that we could summon beings as if they are performers for our amusement adds a layer of irony to the conversation about our significance in the grand scheme of things.

    In the end, it may be worth contemplating whether these beliefs stem from a genuine sense of seeking connection and understanding or if they are simply a diversion from more grounded explorations of evidence and reality. It’s an interesting time to think critically about these varying perspectives, especially as we dig deeper into the mystery of existence itself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *