Luna’s Disclosure Team is Getting Bigger

Luna’s Disclosure Team Expands
Exciting news as new members join Luna’s Disclosure Team:

  • Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.)
  • Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.)
  • Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.)
  • Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.)
  • Rep. Eric Burlison (R-Mo.)
  • Rep. Eli Crane (R-Ariz.)
  • Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas)

This expansion comes just in time for the upcoming deadline on the 18th, when the CIA and other agencies are expected to submit all information they have regarding UAPs.

I can’t help but wonder what’s driving this increase in team size:

  1. Maybe the agencies failed to respond and now need legislative support.
  2. Perhaps a substantial amount of documents were sent, necessitating a larger team.
  3. It’s possible that the documents received were intriguing enough to attract more interest.
  4. Or these representatives might have always intended to join, although Moskowitz appears to be absent.

Check out some thoughts from the new members:
Rep. Luna
Rep. Mace
Rep. Burchett
Rep. Burlison
Rep. Crane

Additionally, Luna appears to hint at some support from Trump.
See here.

What’s your take on the timing of all this?

One thought on “Luna’s Disclosure Team is Getting Bigger

  1. The timing of the expanded team for Luna’s Disclosure initiative is intriguing and could be attributed to a combination of factors. Each of your points seems plausible, and it’s worth considering how they might intersect:

    1. Response to Lack of Agency Answers: If agencies like the CIA are not providing sufficient information or timely responses, it would make sense for Luna and her team to bolster their ranks in order to apply more pressure and present a united front on the issue.

    2. Need for More Resources: If agencies submitted a large volume of documents, the expanded team could help process and analyze this information more effectively. This could streamline the flow of information and lead to more informed discussions.

    3. Interesting Developments: If the agencies provided documents that sparked interest and curiosity, it would naturally attract more representatives. The potential for high-profile revelations could motivate them to get involved more actively.

    4. Pre-existing Plans: It’s also possible that this larger team was part of a strategic plan from the beginning. The nature of UAP discussions often invites political interest, especially with pending deadlines.

    As for Moskowitz’s absence, it may suggest differing priorities or strategies within the wider disclosure movement, which could impact the effectiveness of their efforts.

    Luna’s mention of Trump’s support might add another layer of political strategy, potentially aligning UAP disclosure efforts with broader partisan or campaign goals. Overall, it seems like a mix of opportunism, urgency, and possibly pre-planned strategy are at play here. What’s certain is that as we approach the deadline, all eyes will be on how this team engages with the information they receive.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *