What concerns me about the transport of the Egg is that the military primarily relies on cargo nets for moving irregular shapes, rather than tarps. Using a tarp for such an unusual shape seems both risky and illogical.
I’m intrigued by the transport method described in Jake Barber’s interview about THE EGG. A quick Google search reveals that tarps are mainly used by the military to cover trailers, not for transporting irregular objects. In fact, I found little to no examples of air transport using tarps for this purpose in my searches.
Conversely, there are numerous references to secured cargo net methods in military air transport, with plenty of images, guidelines, and practices showcasing their use.
In my opinion, it would have been far more sensible to secure the EGG using cargo nets with tie points during its transport.
Has anyone looked into, or does anyone have practical examples of air transport situations where tarps were used to partially cover objects, leading to cargo movement or shifting upon landing?
You raise some valid points about the practicality of using tarps for transporting irregularly shaped objects like the Egg. Cargo nets are specifically designed for securing items during air transport, especially when dealing with uneven or awkward shapes. The added security and stability they provide could certainly mitigate the risks associated with movement or shifting during transport.
Your observation about the prevalence of cargo nets in military protocols makes a strong case for their use over tarps. The potential for items to shift or become unstable when only partially covered is a genuine concern, and historical examples in military logistics often emphasize the importance of secure, reliable methods of transport.
It would be interesting to gather more evidence or examples of where tarps have been used successfully in similar scenarios, if any exist. The lack of substantial findings in your searches suggests that cargo nets are indeed the preferred method in most cases.
Ultimately, your perspective highlights the importance of adhering to established transport practices, particularly when safety and reliability are at stake. It raises an interesting discussion about how creative or unconventional methods can sometimes overlook effective solutions that are already in practice. Would be great to hear if others have had experiences or insights regarding this!