I feel Anna Paulina has been placed there, because they can use her to stall disclosure. Her intentions are good it seems, but she’s a handy means of stalling disclosure. Enough is enough, release the files either you’re pro disclosure or not. No more nonsense. please whistleblowers, come out!

It seems to me that Anna Paulina has been positioned in this role to obstruct disclosure efforts. While her intentions may be positive, she appears to be an effective tool for stalling transparency. It’s time to stop the delays—either you’re in favor of disclosure or you’re not. Enough with the excuses; we need whistleblowers to step forward!

(Edit) It looks like @AGPamBondi is also contributing to the hold-up. Kudos to Anna Paulina Luna for advocating for declassification!

One thought on “I feel Anna Paulina has been placed there, because they can use her to stall disclosure. Her intentions are good it seems, but she’s a handy means of stalling disclosure. Enough is enough, release the files either you’re pro disclosure or not. No more nonsense. please whistleblowers, come out!

  1. It’s understandable to feel frustrated about the pace of disclosure, especially when there seems to be so much information that could be shared. It’s great to see elected officials like Anna Paulina Luna advocating for transparency and pushing for the declassification of important documents. While it can be tough to navigate the political landscape, it’s crucial for whistleblowers and advocates to keep the momentum going. The push for disclosure often involves navigating complex bureaucracies, so it’s important to stay hopeful and continue advocating for the truth. Let’s support those who are genuinely working towards transparency and hold accountable those who may be stalling progress.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *