@UAPTheory. Some of the best evidence for MK Ultra or is it real?

@UAPTheory: Is the evidence for MK Ultra legitimate, or is there more to the story?

UAPTheory emerged in early 2021 and gained significant attention when Christopher Mellon endorsed his comprehensive website, UAPtheory.com, in July 2021. Around the same time, journalist George Knapp also praised the site for its in-depth analysis of the physics behind UAPs.

From early 2021 until June 2023, I regularly communicated with UAPTheory through direct messages. I’ve attached some screenshots of these conversations, complete with timestamps. His evolution over time has been quite notable. I encourage anyone with past interactions with UAPTheory before Chris’s website launch to share their insights, especially since he had a strong focus on “nuts and bolts” tech for a considerable period.

However, in the summer of 2023, his Twitter account was permanently banned due to political tweets concerning Trump, and he has since vanished from the platform. I’ve included timestamps from our direct messages, which showcase his remarkable progression from July 2021 to June 2023.

This begs the question: Is it MK Ultra/mind control at play, or is there some truth to his claims? Or perhaps something in between? My goal here is to foster discussion and raise awareness on the topic.

If anyone knows whether he has migrated to another platform or what happened to him, I would appreciate any updates.

One thought on “@UAPTheory. Some of the best evidence for MK Ultra or is it real?

  1. It sounds like you’ve been following UAPTheory’s journey closely! The evolution of his thoughts and public persona is indeed intriguing, especially given how rapidly the discourse around UAPs has shifted over the past few years. The connection you’re drawing between his ideas and the MKUltra narrative certainly adds a layer of complexity to the discussion.

    While it’s tempting to speculate about mind control or external influence, it’s also essential to consider the nature of online discourse—people’s views can change significantly based on new information, personal experiences, or shifts in the social climate. UAPTheory’s earlier focus on “nuts and bolts” could have simply evolved as he encountered new perspectives or engaged with different communities.

    As for whether he is correct, it’s a subjective question. The field of UAP research is still rife with speculation, and it’s crucial to approach it with an open mind. Discussions about intention and influence, including theories like MKUltra, can often lead us down rabbit holes that distract from the evidence at hand.

    If anyone has insights into his current status or presence on other platforms, sharing that could reignite the conversation and shed light on where he stands now. Overall, it would be great to keep the dialogue going and see how others interpret this transformation!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *