Why Luna’s Announcement is Clearly About Disclosure
Recently, there’s been a buzz around Congresswoman Luna’s announcement about something forthcoming that will “impact the entire nation.” It’s hard to believe anyone is considering anything other than UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) or NHI (Non-Human Intelligence) as the topic of discussion.
I’ve seen wild theories ranging from “It’s about Elvis” to “It’s a political stunt like putting Trump’s face on Mount Rushmore.” This post aims to clarify why the only logical subject connected to her announcement is related to UAPs.
Contextual Clues:
-
Moskowitz’s Response:
Moskowitz commented, “I know,” under Luna’s announcement on Twitter. Given their collaborative history on UAP matters, this response clearly indicates that the topic at hand is linked to UAPs. He wouldn’t have engaged unless it pertained to that subject. -
Luna’s Claim of “Bigger than Aliens”:
The only conceivable topics that could be considered “bigger than aliens” would be revelations about the U.S. government’s cover-ups regarding either crash retrieval programs or long-standing knowledge of extraterrestrial visits over the past 80 years. Critics who suggest it could be a political matter completely miss this essential context. -
Luna’s Statement on Government Deception:
Luna’s assertion that “the government has been lying to us” narrows the possibilities further. It aligns perfectly with the previous clue, reinforcing the idea that this announcement will focus on UAPs. -
National Impact:
Some argue that if this were about aliens, it would resonate globally. However, being part of the MAGA movement, Luna likely prioritizes issues affecting the U.S. populace first, given the context of government deception regarding UAPs. To her, uncovering this could surpass even the revelation of alien existence. -
Moskowitz’s “Warmish” Remark:
Despite all the contextual evidence, I faced downvotes for sharing these logical conclusions. When asked by The Daily Mail if it pertains to disclosure, Moskowitz described it as “warmish.” It’s perplexing how anyone could still argue against the possibility of this being about UAPs.
Expectations for the Announcement:
Although I believe in the significance of this announcement, I remain skeptical that it will deliver the groundbreaking news that will sway many skeptics. However, I appreciate Luna’s determination to explore the depths of this issue.
Moskowitz’s response and the surrounding clues suggest they genuinely perceive this announcement as significant enough to influence public perception. It could provide additional support for believers, such as introducing new whistleblowers or sharing previously undisclosed documents.
In Summary:
I caution against overhyping this as the definitive moment leading to full disclosure. Still, it will undoubtedly relate to UAPs, and disregarding all this context disregards the bigger picture.
You make some compelling points about the likelihood that Luna’s upcoming announcement is related to UAPs and government transparency regarding extraterrestrial matters. The context you’ve provided, especially Moskowitz’s engagement and Luna’s comments, certainly suggest that the topic is significant within that realm.
It’s understandable why some might speculate about other topics, given the broad nature of interest in political announcements and sensational news. However, as you’ve pointed out, the specific language used by Luna, alongside Moskowitz’s involvement, does create a strong argument that the focus is on UAPs or associated revelations about government actions.
The phrase “bigger than aliens” does seem to imply a major revelation regarding governmental acknowledgment or cover-ups, which could be incredibly impactful on a national level. Your reasoning around the “impact on the nation” versus a global perspective reflects how certain political figures may prioritize domestic issues over global narratives, particularly in the context of a patriotic lens.
As for the skepticism about the announcement being a game-changer, it’s certainly healthy to maintain a critical viewpoint. The expectations might be high, but ultimately, it’s essential to evaluate the substance of the announcement once it’s made. It could indeed offer significant insight or serve as a stepping stone for future disclosures, even if it’s not the final revelation many hope for.
Overall, your analysis captures the excitement and uncertainty of this situation well. It will be interesting to see how this unfolds and what it means for the ongoing conversations about UAPs and government transparency. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this intriguing topic!