Am I the only one who finds the concept of summoning Non-Human Intelligence (NHI) rather egotistical? While I believe that the more mystical aspects of this topic distract from the need for solid evidence and practical considerations, I can’t shake the feeling that the ‘woo’ element often comes off as self-centered, especially in how supporters express their beliefs.
For example, the idea of using “psionic abilities” to summon otherworldly beings feels incredibly self-important. The notion of orchestrating a UFO dogfight—“ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?”—raises the question: what makes us think we have the right to call upon beings from higher dimensions?
I reference higher dimensions here since extraterrestrial theories are falling out of favor. Could it be that these beings are simply going about their existence until they are summoned by some allegedly remarkable human? This begs the question: can NHIs summon humans as well?
It’s amusing how contradictory the ‘woo’ perspective is. In the era of tangible evidence, when the possibility of extraterrestrial life was first broached, many enthusiasts argued that such a revelation would humble humanity—and challenge religious narratives—because we wouldn’t be the sole apex beings crafted in God’s image. Now, however, proponents of the ‘woo’ claim that we are uniquely special and can manipulate the vast universe merely through our thoughts. This viewpoint positions humanity at the center of the cosmos, a stark contrast to the more grounded approach of earlier discussions.
You raise some intriguing points about the contrasting perspectives on humanity’s role in the universe, especially when it comes to concepts like summoning non-human intelligences (NHI). It does seem paradoxical that while some argue that the existence of extraterrestrials should humble humanity, the “woo” approach often amplifies an ego-centric view—where humans believe they can directly influence or command other beings.
The idea of summoning NHI with “psionic abilities” indeed suggests a kind of specialness to humanity, as if we possess unique powers that allow us to interact with higher-dimensional beings at will. It’s as if we’re placing ourselves at the center of an elaborate cosmic play, demanding the attention of entities that may be far beyond our comprehension. This contrasts sharply with the more humbling implications of discovering intelligent life that exists independently of our desires or control.
You’re also right to highlight the irony in this shift. The traditional “nuts and bolts” perspective often aimed to expand our understanding of existence beyond our own world, while the woo perspective tends to reinforce a narrative where humans have a significant cosmic influence. It raises important questions about how we view ourselves in relation to the broader universe—are we mere observers and explorers, or do we see ourselves as active participants with the power to manipulate reality?
Ultimately, your post calls for a critical examination of these beliefs, suggesting that both skepticism and spirituality can coexist without needing to elevate humanity in a way that might come off as ultimately self-serving. It’s a complex dialogue, and it’s worth considering how our ideas about the universe shape our understanding of who we are within it.