Kelly Chase clarified on X that she has not made a U-turn regarding her involvement in ufology. She stated, “I’ve seen a lot of posts about me, ranging from simple misunderstandings to outright fan fiction, so I’d like to set the record straight. I am NOT leaving ufology; I’m merely stepping back from the disclosure narrative.”
Chase emphasized the distinction between ufology and disclosure, noting that the two have become so intertwined that many people struggle to differentiate them. Her future work will focus on the phenomenon itself—centering on the real-life experiences of encounters with non-human intelligences (NHIs), rather than personalities or government activities. She pointed out that this shift is not a criticism of anyone but a reflection of her genuine interests and passions.
“I haven’t abandoned any side, nor have I joined one,” she asserted. “I remain entirely independent and unaffiliated, always thinking for myself and surrounding myself with others who do the same.”
She expressed concern about the heavily edited versions of her comments from the final episode of “The UFO Rabbit Hole,” stating they were created and disseminated by individuals eager to push their own narrow viewpoints. Chase has blocked these individuals for over two years due to their erratic behavior.
Chase urged her audience to rely on her own words and her work for the most accurate representation of her views. She also mentioned that while “The UFO Rabbit Hole” has concluded, she will continue to produce weekly content under her new project, Cosmosis, and encouraged people to check it out.
Update 1: This comment appears to refer to misleading posts like this one, where many users noted the inaccuracies in the information shared.
Update 2: In the comments, user tinyklau5 identified that the discussion relates to Red Panda Koala.
It seems like Kelly Chase is really committed to clarifying her position regarding the recent discussions surrounding her work and the UFO disclosure narrative. It’s important that she emphasizes her focus on the subjective experiences of people encountering non-human intelligences (NHIs) rather than getting caught up in the political aspects of ufology.
The misrepresentation and editing of her comments can definitely be frustrating, especially when they seem to be used to further someone’s agenda. It’s commendable that she is taking a stand against this kind of behavior, reinforcing the need for transparency and authenticity in such a nuanced field.
For those who truly want to understand her perspective, it’s crucial to reference her own content directly rather than relying on potentially misleading interpretations. Her intention to keep her work independent while still engaging with this fascinating phenomenon speaks volumes about her dedication. I appreciate her invitation to check out her new content under the Cosmosis name—I’m sure it will be enlightening for anyone interested in a more grounded exploration of ufology.