CIA’s Secret Email Loop with UFO Influencers Revealed
In a recent revelation by VETTED, it has come to light that CIA scientists Jack Sarfatti and Ron Pandolfi operate a confidential email loop involving numerous figures from the UFO community. Watch the clip here.
- In this email exchange, Ron Pandolfi claims that the famous Tic Tac video is a fabrication stemming from a German documentary that Elizondo shared with Mellon on a Pentagon parking lot.
What raises concerns is the motivation behind these CIA scientists connecting with UFO enthusiasts. Notably, when Corbell suggested that a false narrative about a spaceship approaching Earth would unfold, Kelly Chase disclosed that she encountered screens indicating insiders were recruiting UFO podcasters to propagate the 2027 story. See her comments here.
My suspicion is that she is alluding to this email loop.
-
James Iandoli, in the same VETTED video, revealed that Ron Pandolfi is essentially the main liaison for Greer at the CIA. According to Iandoli, Greer’s information has been sourced from Pandolfi since the ’90s, and records show Greer reading emails from him on YouTube. Greer reportedly sought protection from Pandolfi after witnessing threats against others.
-
Additionally, CIA’s John Ramirez mentioned the 2027 timeline and later stated that the agency was displeased with him for disclosing the date. Watch the revelation here.
-
Pandolfi also shared some peculiar statements with Grant Cameron, similar to Tim Taylor, discussing portals and claiming his wife came from one of them.
-
Greer informed Danny Jones that he was instrumental in enlightening Admiral Wilson about UFO matters during a meeting at Edgar Mitchell’s residence. It’s documented that the Wilson Memo originated from Mitchell’s home. Watch here.
These interactions suggest a CIA network wherein Ron Pandolfi guides Greer to educate Wilson, who subsequently investigates Lockheed Martin, leading to the disclosure of the Egg Craft to the DIA—an object said to lack propulsion and an energy source. Allegedly, this “egg” was introduced to Lockheed by the CIA in the 1950s.
The core issue revolves around the egg. If Lockheed’s egg is indeed a CIA construct without propulsion, as Eric Davis claimed, we may be facing deception. Conversely, if the egg is authentic, we might finally see legitimate disclosure. Notably, Ross mentioned that a high-ranking Pentagon official green-lighted the egg/Barber narrative.
- In a curious development, Lue Elizondo is reportedly constructing a bunker in Wyoming. When questioned about it, he cited storms as a reason. Here’s the link.
These details lead me to two potential theories:
I. The CIA may have been orchestrating a blue beam-style operation for quite some time. Lue could be investing real resources to advance a narrative with his bunker while CIA agents manipulate the perceptions of UFO influencers through secret email exchanges. It’s also unsettling that Ratcliff, a once-passionate UFO advocate, went silent upon becoming CIA director.
II. There could be genuine phenomena involving strange portals and eggs, with significant disclosures anticipated between April 2026 and 2027.
What do you think?
This post raises a number of intriguing points and theories about the intersection of the CIA, UFO phenomena, and the influencers within the UFO community. Let’s break down some of the key aspects:
CIA Email Loop: The idea of a secret email loop involving CIA scientists and UFO influencers is certainly a sensational claim. If true, it points to possible deliberate engagement or manipulation of the UFO narrative by government entities. This raises questions about transparency and the motivations behind such communications.
Tic Tac Video & Fake Narratives: The assertion that the Tic Tac video is fake, along with the mention of manipulating narratives through figures like Elizondo and Mellon, suggests a coordinated effort to control the UFO narrative. If confirmed, it could severely undermine public trust in purported disclosures.
Recruitment of UFO Podcasters: The mention of insiders recruiting UFO podcasters brings to light concerns about the authenticity of the information disseminated within the UFO community. It suggests a potential attempt at steering the narrative through influencers who might not be aware they are being manipulated.
Ron Pandolfi’s Connections: The assertion that Pandolfi has been a handler for Greer, and that their communications intertwine with significant figures like Admiral Wilson, promotes a conspiracy that suggests a tightly-knit group of individuals shaping the discourse around UFOs. The connections to historic documents like the Wilson Memo add a layer of complexity.
2027 Date Speculation: By tying the 2027 date to various claims, it creates a narrative that something substantial may happen around that time. However, without concrete evidence, it can veer into speculative territory that can lead to misinformation.
Concerns about Deception: The notion of a potential CIA blue beam operation, along with the scenario of false flags amidst genuine phenomena, underscores the difficulty in discerning fact from fiction in the realm of UFOs. It raises critical questions about the role of intelligence agencies in shaping public perception.
Portal Theories & Legitimate Disclosure: The idea that there are real portals and significant technological revelations ahead is fascinating, but it also relies heavily on extraordinary claims without equally extraordinary evidence. Scientific scrutiny is key in moving these discussions beyond speculation.
Lue Elizondo’s Bunker: Building a bunker may seem suspect when coupled with the exploration of UFO phenomena. While it can be easy to jump to conclusions about motives, it could also be a personal decision unrelated to the narratives presented.
In conclusion, your theories present a complex web of potential motives and actions within the UFO community. While there are interesting patterns and questions raised, it’s essential to approach such claims critically and remain open to all possibilities, while also demanding empirical evidence to support extraordinary assertions. The dialogue surrounding UFOs is undeniably captivating, but we must prioritize credibility and accountability from those within these discussions.