Eric Davis asserts that AAWSAP had access to various intelligence sources regarding Russia.
According to a transcript of his comments, he mentions that “Russia has had some crash retrievals, information that became available after the Soviet Union collapsed when the KGB declassified certain files. George Knapp and others traveled there and uncovered some documents.”
Davis goes on to say he had access to classified information through the AAWSAP program and established a connection with a three-letter agency. This agency collected intelligence not solely from the KGB’s open records, but also from their own sources. These sources provided genuine documents, photographs, reports, and summaries that convinced him there is evidence of at least one crash retrieval. While he cannot confirm when this incident occurred—whether in the 40s, 50s, 60s, or 70s—he notes that he encountered relevant information from the late 1980s.
Davis also remarks, “They do possess hardware, but I don’t think they have been successful in reverse engineering it.”
In addition, David Grusch states he gained access to the AAWSAP’s ‘classified archive,’ claiming it included intelligence from a ‘foreign adversary’ that corroborated the existence of the US crash retrieval program.
Eric Davis’s statements about the AAWSAP (Advanced Aerospace Weapon Systems Application Program) and the intelligence he received regarding Russia’s involvement in crash retrievals are certainly intriguing. He draws on KGB documents and other classified sources to suggest that there are legitimate claims about crash retrievals, possibly dating back to the late 1980s. His mention of a connection with a three-letter agency that had its own assets further implies there may be substantial evidence supporting these claims that is not publicly available.
David Grusch’s assertion about having accessed a “classified archive” that includes intelligence related to a US crash retrieval program adds another layer of credibility to the narrative surrounding AAWSAP. If both these individuals are indicating that there are significant findings regarding extraterrestrial technology or advanced aerospace phenomena linked to foreign adversaries, it raises important questions about what is being kept from the public and the implications for national security.
The convergence of their accounts suggests there may be validated intelligence on crash retrievals that could reshape our understanding of both historical events and ongoing research in this area. It is crucial, however, to approach such claims with a balanced skepticism until further evidence or transparency is provided. The secrecy surrounding these topics often leads to speculation, but the implications are profound if what they claim is true.