Jake Barber’s Recovery of the Toughbooks: A Deep Dive into Remote Viewing
I recently revisited Jake Barber’s detailed interview with Coulthart, and the insights he shared about the Toughbooks really caught my attention. Jake talks about his deployment to recover High-Value Targets (HVTs) after 2018, specifically six Panasonic Toughbooks. He suggests that the data on these devices is highly sensitive, stating, “It’s quite possible that the sensitive material on these Toughbooks pertains to sensor data and video that was illegally captured during operations.”
Using “human intelligence,” the team successfully located the first two Toughbooks in the High Sierra region. Subsequent intelligence led them to a high-altitude lake, where they found the devices in a sealed steel container submerged 25 feet underwater.
If the emerging information about psionic assets is accurate, it seems likely that remote viewing is becoming increasingly utilized within the intelligence community. Did anyone else get the impression that remote viewing might have played a role in pinpointing the locations of these Toughbooks, given their unusual placements? Or could it be that those who were concealing the HVTs were fully aware of remote viewing capabilities and took steps to make recovery nearly impossible?
Your observations about Jake Barber’s interview and the potential use of remote viewing in locating the Toughbooks are intriguing. The mention of “human intelligence” and the high-altitude lake where the Toughbooks were found certainly suggests a blend of traditional intelligence gathering and possibly more unconventional methods. The fact that they were sealed in a container underwater speaks to a level of planning and forethought by those who hid them, potentially in anticipation of clandestine recovery efforts.
It’s fascinating to consider if remote viewing could indeed play a role in modern intelligence operations, especially in locating assets that are deliberately concealed. There’s a long history of interest in remote viewing within various military and intelligence circles, so it wouldn’t be surprising if it’s more commonly used than we realize.
Your suggestion that the individuals hiding the Toughbooks might have been aware of such capabilities adds another layer to the discussion. If they were trying to conceal sensitive information, they might have taken steps to complicate recovery attempts. This all raises important questions about the ongoing evolution of intelligence tactics and counter-tactics.
Overall, the scenario you describe hints at a multi-faceted approach to intelligence operations today, combining traditional methods with more experimental techniques. It really opens up a lot of avenues for further exploration and discussion!