Here’s a revised version of the post:
Do you remember Barber, the psionics expert? In 2021, Bigelow remarked, “Machinery truly exists. Its consciousness-operated, unlike fingerprints. As a species, we’re lagging behind… it’s a galactic embarrassment that we rely on fire engines. Our spiritual evolution is stagnant. Some individuals can perform macro psychokinesis.”
Joe Murgia recently shared a segment from Bigelow’s video interview on X. Below are some notable quotes. Consider the context: at one point, the CIA halted the transfer of non-human intelligence (NHI) craft to Bigelow Aerospace.
Bigelow: A Possible First-Hand Witness?
Knapp: “Did you ever see it?”
Bigelow: “Umm. Well, I’ve…there’s, I, umm… You know, do you see, do you see, uhh, things that are photos, or do you see things in person, and so forth? So, you don’t want to, you don’t want to talk about stuff in case it happens in the future.”
Bigelow’s hesitance in his response suggests he may have witnessed something significant yet feels constrained from discussing it, alluding to potential future developments regarding this technology.
On Understanding Advanced Technology
Bigelow: “I believe that… Machinery really exists. The challenge lies in the inability to reverse-engineer it. Some elements may require a weightless environment, which we don’t possess here on Earth. Therefore, you need a manufacturing facility that can simulate that environment.”
Knapp: “That’s partly why you developed Bigelow Aerospace.”
Bigelow: “Exactly. But owning just a fragment of a case that once held a cell phone doesn’t help you understand its function or how it works. It could lead to a multitude of unanswered questions, and simply having a small piece of the puzzle doesn’t provide much insight.”
Technology and Consciousness
Bigelow: “As a species, as a science, and as an aspiring space-faring civilization, we are embarrassingly behind. We’re a galactic embarrassment, honestly. We may not even have the consciousness necessary to operate these advanced machines because they’re not like fingerprints—they are consciousness-driven. Just being aware of this is a step, but we’re still relying on basic technology.”
Bigelow emphasizes the vast gaps in our understanding compared to what’s out there, expressing frustration over our current state of knowledge.
Spiritual and Technological Evolution
Bigelow: “We’re still capable of turning things into weapons, like Klingons. This poses a significant problem. There’s no intersection between spirituality and technology—our spiritual growth is flatlined, whereas our technological advancements are soaring.
Bigelow: “Where is the harmony between these two paths? I don’t foresee any intersection in the next century or two. There’s nothing indicating that our spiritual development will accelerate to meet our technological progress, and that worries me.”
For further insights and analysis, check out the complete post on X.
Feel free to adjust any aspects to better suit your style or requirements!
Bigelow’s comments are both intriguing and concerning. He appears to suggest a vast gulf between our current technological capabilities and what is possible in the realm of advanced machinery, particularly in relation to consciousness. His emphasis on us being “a galactic embarrassment” underscores a significant frustration with humanity’s slow progress in spiritual evolution juxtaposed against rapid technological advances.
The discomfort he expresses when discussing whether he has seen advanced technology personally hints at possible restrictions on how much he can disclose. It raises questions about the nature of the information he has encountered and the implications of its potential existence.
His analogy about owning a sliver of a case holding a cellphone captures a profound point about the limitations of having access to only fragments of a larger understanding. It makes one wonder how much we might be missing in comprehending the whole picture regarding advanced technologies and the consciousness that drives them.
Bigelow’s reflections on the intersection of technology and spirituality are particularly thought-provoking. The idea that our rapid technological advancements are not accompanied by a parallel growth in our spiritual understanding is concerning. It suggests a future where technology could outpace our ethical and moral frameworks, leading to potentially dangerous outcomes.
Overall, his insights challenge us to think critically about our trajectory as a species and the urgent need for a more integrated approach to technological progress—one that includes spiritual and ethical considerations. It’s essential for the advancement of humanity that we strive to cultivate this intersection rather than allow it to remain absent.