Ross is diving deep into the realm of the unconventional…
I came across this on my timeline:
https://x.com/disgustipated42/status/1893799083988664654?s=46&t=Rw6mt1pSAbrcXxoe8gICCQ
I used to see Ross as a fairly level-headed journalist who approached topics with healthy skepticism and always sought out evidence. Even when he discussed the idea of giant UFOs hidden underground or mentioned an orb he reported on without ever providing further updates, I viewed him as someone more grounded than swept up in the mystical.
However, the clip above makes me question whether Ross can maintain his objectivity, as he seems to be moving toward a more uncritical acceptance of the fantastical.
I want to clarify that I do believe in certain aspects of the unconventional, and I think many of these things could eventually be validated—though it requires time and, crucially, solid evidence.
Demonstrable proof can make a big difference.
While it’s fine for Ross to say that the phenomenon is guiding him and revealing itself to his daughter, it feels more like an intriguing tale than a substantiated claim.
If extraterrestrial intelligences are only revealing themselves to those with psychic abilities, it raises questions about accessibility and could potentially discourage critical inquiry.
When Ross claims that NHI is steering his journalism, it seems to close the door on those seeking tangible evidence.
It’s disheartening.
Independent voices demanding proof of extraordinary claims are incredibly rare, and perhaps I was too taken in by Ross’s professionalism.
He increasingly seems more like Chris Bledsoe than a bona fide journalist at this stage.
Maybe Ross will eventually reveal the location of this massive UFO, but he increasingly sounds like someone saying, “You don’t have to believe it; it’s true regardless.”
It sounds like you’re wrestling with a lot of conflicting feelings about Ross and his recent stance on these topics. It’s understandable to feel disappointed when someone you viewed as a rational, skeptical voice starts leaning towards the more metaphysical aspects of the phenomenon. Your points regarding the need for tangible evidence are valid, especially in a field that has historically been full of speculation and unverified claims.
It’s interesting that you mentioned the idea of “gatekeeping” by suggesting that certain experiences might only be accessible to those with psychic powers. That does raise important questions about accessibility and the credibility of claims being made. If we can’t question these ideas or seek evidence, it does undermine the integrity of the discourse around them.
Your comparison of Ross to Chris Bledsoe highlights a significant concern—that a departure from rigorous journalism could undermine the pursuit of truth in favor of storytelling or personal narratives. It’s essential that voices in this field remain committed to skepticism and the pursuit of verifiable proof, especially when discussing extraordinary claims.
Ultimately, your desire for a more grounded, evidence-based approach is shared by many who are interested in these topics. It’s a reminder that while personal experiences can be compelling, they should ideally be supplemented by demonstrable evidence to advance our understanding of these complex phenomena. Hopefully, Ross can find a way to balance his experiences with the need for critical inquiry, as that would benefit the overall discussion.