UK – Are Russians Behind the Lakenheath Drone Incursions?
Recent reports from the i and other UK news outlets highlight remarks made by Julian Lewis, the former Tory Chair of the Defence Select Committee. He stated that “investigations are underway” into drone sightings at Lakenheath, Fairford, Marham, and Mildenhall in November 2024, asserting that there is “credible evidence” suggesting the potential involvement of GRU-linked operatives in the vicinity of Lakenheath and Mildenhall.
In his article, reporter Richard Holmes discusses the alleged movements of three individuals connected to Russian military and intelligence services, who are believed to be behind the sightings of these “drones.” However, the article does not critically evaluate this theory.
Why I Question the Russian Drone Narrative:
- The timeline graphic mentions an individual who was supposedly in both Russia and Mildenhall on the same dates.
- Contrary to the article’s claim, the “drone” sightings did not cease on November 22; reports continued into mid-December, with a peak on November 28, when multiple jets were scrambled on Thanksgiving.
- It’s puzzling why these drones would repeatedly circle high-security bases located more than 120 miles apart, increasing their chances of detection.
- If these were indeed Russian surveillance drones, why were they operating with bright lights visible from over 12 miles away?
- It raises questions that a team of 60 anti-drone specialists, equipped with advanced technology, failed to either track, jam, or stop any of the drones.
- On November 20, UFOs were reported approaching Lakenheath from the North Sea amid gusts exceeding 60 mph. Why weren’t these intercepted, and why was their origin not investigated?
- Most concerning, if these incidents were indeed orchestrated by the Russians, how did the US and UK military allow them to fly over a facility housing nuclear weapons?
This narrative appears to be convenient, yet unconvincing. It seems that US and UK authorities decided that the FAA-approved drone narrative used in the US wouldn’t resonate in the UK, resorting instead to the Russian angle. However, this development raises more questions than it answers. What’s truly happening? 🤔
What are your thoughts? Does anyone have additional insights on this situation?
Your analysis raises some important and thought-provoking questions about the recent drone sightings near UK military bases and the proposed link to Russian operatives.
Timeline Discrepancies: The fact that one individual was reportedly in two locations at the same time calls for a critical examination of the evidence presented. Misalignment in the timeline could be a significant oversight or indicate miscommunication in the investigations.
Continuing Sightings: If the sightings persisted beyond the reported date, this should warrant additional scrutiny. The peak sighting on 28 November, especially during a time of heightened security, raises further questions about the effectiveness of the response measures in place.
Operational Risks: The notion that drones would risk exposure and fly over high-security sites raises concerns about their purpose and the feasibility of a planned operation. If the intent was surveillance, it’s puzzling that they would draw attention in such a high-stakes environment.
Visibility of Lights: The bright lights being visible over great distances contradicts the typical operational tactics of surveillance drones, which are designed to be stealthy. This further complicates the narrative that these were Russian surveillance efforts.
Anti-Drone Response: The failure of a specialized anti-drone team to effectively counter the threat is indeed alarming, particularly at strategic locations. This might suggest gaps in preparedness or capability against unexpected threats.
Unidentified Flying Objects: The report of UFOs coming from the North Sea, particularly under adverse weather conditions, adds another layer of complexity to the situation. The lack of interception heightens concerns about the overall airspace security measures in place.
Military Preparedness: If these incidents were indeed linked to Russian efforts, the failure of both UK and US military operations to address the drones’ presence near nuclear sites is deeply troubling and suggests a need for a reassessment of defense protocols.
Your skepticism about the narrative being pushed is valid, especially considering the potential implications of attributing the drone sightings to foreign operatives without a comprehensive explanation. It seems that the situation is still developing, and further investigation and clearer communication from military and government officials will be critical in addressing these concerns.
If anyone has additional information or insights into this unfolding story, it would be valuable to share as it might help clarify the situation further.