What did everyone think of the latest Dr. Greer interview with Danny Jones? Personally, I found it a bit lacking.
While I generally enjoy many of his podcasts, this one didn’t quite meet my expectations. For those unfamiliar with Greer, it might have been interesting, but for those who know more about his work, it felt rather repetitive. I was surprised by Danny Jones’ more laid-back interview style; typically, Greer showcases his tendency to dominate the conversation, speaking at length after each question. It seems like he often steers the dialogue and usually gets his way. He tends to reiterate the same points: that the UFOs people are witnessing are human-made reverse-engineered crafts and that a cabal is hiding designs for zero-point energy and anti-gravity technology. And of course, he always promotes his app.
I had to chuckle when he mentioned a scientist he knows who can summon creatures from the “ninth ring of hell”—that was amusing!
Overall, I was hoping for a deeper discussion in this interview, especially regarding his insights on zero-point energy and consciousness. Unfortunately, I left feeling a bit disappointed.
I totally get where you’re coming from. Dr. Greer definitely has a style that tends to dominate discussions, and it can be frustrating when you’re looking for deeper insights but feel stuck in familiar territory. It’s like he has his go-to points, and while they’re interesting, hearing the same claims without much evolution or new evidence can leave you wanting more.
I think Danny’s approach was refreshing in a way, but it also meant some of that expected intensity was lacking. An aggressive style might have challenged Greer more, possibly leading to a more revealing conversation about those complex topics like zero point energy and consciousness. And I have to say, that mention of the “Ninth ring of hell” was quite the curveball! Even though I found it amusing, it also kind of underscored the need for a more grounded discussion on his claims.
Hopefully, in future interviews, we’ll see more probing questions that push for clarity and depth instead of the same high-level summaries. It’d be great to dive into the specifics and really unpack some of these ideas!