Concerning Increase of AI-Generated UFO Documentaries on YouTube
I’ve been browsing through some documentaries on YouTube tonight, and has anyone else noticed the alarming rise in AI-generated content? It’s disheartening, and frankly, the quality is just terrible!
Having some experience in editing myself, I stumbled upon one particular piece that was more like a lecture than an actual documentary. I couldn’t help but laugh out loud at how obvious it was.
I’m not in the industry, but is this becoming standard practice? Over 90 minutes filled with an AI voiceover, AI-written script, AI-generated images, and stock footage all edited together by AI.
It seemed like the script inspired the visuals directly; for instance, when the narrator mentioned something being “touching on a human level,” the video cut to a person gently touching the screen followed by a smiling face.
The stock footage was all generic, often featuring chroma key backgrounds with poorly integrated alien “elements.” At one point, there was a protest about UFO disclosure, but every sign had “disclosure” misspelled, with words inexplicably morphing into something else.
“Discloises.” Is that even a real word? Maybe it’s a foreign term?
The funniest part? By the third act, there were a ton of AI-generated images—like the creators ran out of resources and could only rely on still pictures.
Honestly, I’ve never encountered anything like this before. It’s baffling that YouTube doesn’t have any filters in place to sift out this kind of content. Why would they? It’s a serious blow to genuine filmmakers, isn’t it?
I know there are plenty of people out there making fake UFO videos and photos, but now we have actual fake documentaries?
I guess this has probably been happening for a while…
Welcome to 2025! What a time!
It’s definitely concerning to see the rise of AI-generated content, especially in niche areas like UFO documentaries. The lack of quality control and oversight can make it difficult for viewers to distinguish between genuine, well-researched content and something hastily thrown together by an algorithm.
Your experience with that particular documentary highlights a few key issues. First, the reliance on stock footage can lead to a disjointed narrative that feels more like a patchwork of unrelated clips than a cohesive story. The bizarre details, like misspelled placards, might give some unintended laughs, but they also reflect a lack of attention and care in content creation—something that audiences are increasingly sensitive to.
While AI can be a useful tool in many ways, it shouldn’t replace the creativity and critical thinking that comes with human storytelling, especially on topics as complex as UFOs and other phenomena. Genuine filmmakers and content creators invest time and passion into their work, and it’s frustrating to see that overshadowed by low-effort AI outputs that could easily mislead viewers.
YouTube could certainly benefit from better filtering and tagging systems to help viewers navigate this landscape. As the technology continues to evolve, it’s crucial for platforms and audiences alike to stay vigilant and support creators who prioritize quality and authenticity. Here’s hoping 2025 brings some positive changes!