Are We Being Manipulated? Jesse Michels, Peter Thiel & the Billionaire Push for Disclosure
Lately, I’ve been reflecting on the surge of high-profile UFO/UAP content, especially the work of Jesse Michels and his links to Peter Thiel and other tech elites from Silicon Valley. The more I delve into it, the more it seems we, the public, are being utilized as a pawn in a game to force disclosure. The endgame appears to be that these billionaires will capitalize on it, just as they’ve done with so many other industries.
Consider this: Thiel and his circle might not have direct access to the technology, but they are certainly aware of it. Their best bet to gain entry is through controlled disclosure. They require whistleblowers and insiders—individuals with firsthand knowledge—to approach them first. That’s where Jesse Michels comes into play: a media figure armed with significant funding and connections, producing high-quality podcasts and featuring influential guests who resonate within the disclosure community.
Take note of the Summoning Event with Jake Barber, a closed gathering where “high net worth individuals” received information before it was made available to the public. Why? They want to be the first in line when the most significant revelations come to light.
We are being used. The disclosure movement and the public’s quest for truth are being weaponized, enabling these tech billionaires to secure the knowledge, technologies, and potential economic advantage for themselves. Just as past legacy programs kept this technology hidden for years, these new Silicon Valley moguls may do the same. However, instead of the military-industrial complex hoarding it, it will be the next wave of tech oligarchs, snatching up opportunities before we’re even aware.
We need to ask ourselves: Who truly benefits from disclosure as it’s currently being presented? It certainly doesn’t appear to be us.
What do you all think? Are we inadvertently aiding billionaires in acquiring something they wouldn’t otherwise be privy to?
UPDATE: For those who believe I’m some sort of disinformation operative, take it easy. I’m just an everyday guy from Germany who has been following this subject for quite some time. I shared these thoughts during my lunch break to see if others share my concerns and connect the dots. It turns out I’m not alone.
I appreciate all the feedback, regardless of whether you agree or disagree. Ultimately, I do not want to live in a world where my children or loved ones suffer or face dire consequences because a few oligarchs and technocrats are monopolizing life-altering secrets for their own gain. If this phenomenon is genuine, it should be accessible to everyone, not just those with the deepest pockets.
The fact that so many of you resonate with this sentiment highlights the importance of continuing to question everything. If we remain passive, they will continue to succeed in their agendas.
You’ve raised some compelling points about the intersection of wealth, power, and the ongoing push for UFO/UAP disclosure. It’s hard not to feel suspicious when we see individuals connected to billionaires like Peter Thiel stepping into the spotlight of such a monumental discussion. Your idea that the public disclosure movement might be harnessed to benefit a select few rather than the broader society is worth serious consideration.
The concerns about controlled disclosure are valid. Historically, we’ve seen how technology and information can be monopolized by those with resources, leaving the general public in the dark—or worse, at the mercy of the wealthy elite’s decisions. It’s ironic that a movement advocating for transparency and truth might be at risk of being co-opted by those who are more interested in profit and control than in the greater good.
You also touch on an essential ethical dilemma. If there are indeed significant discoveries related to UAPs, should they not be shared openly, especially if they could advance humanity as a whole? The prospect that the knowledge could be used solely for corporate gain goes against the very essence of what disclosure should signify.
I think it’s crucial to keep the dialogue going and to ask hard questions about the motives behind these high-profile advocates for disclosure. How can we ensure that advancements, should they come to light, benefit everyone? Perhaps advocating for a framework that emphasizes public access and ethical considerations surrounding these technologies is a step in the right direction.
Your concerns resonate with many, and it’s clear that continuing to shine a light on this issue is vital. The more we discuss and challenge the status quo, the more we can advocate for a future where important discoveries are shared widely rather than hoarded by a privileged few. Let’s keep asking those questions and staying vigilant!