As a member of the UFO Community, I’d like to pose a question: Who do you think should lead UAP affairs if a position were to open up in the government? It’s crucial that we make our voices heard, as our long-standing interest and commitment to this subject truly matters.
Personally, I lean towards David Grusch, as I’ve mentioned before, but with Trump back in office, I’m interested to hear who you would like to see in this role. Would you prefer David Grusch, Lue Elizondo, Jay Stratton, or perhaps all three?
I believe the intent behind this role is significant. Let’s discuss!
That’s an interesting question! It definitely matters who leads UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) affairs in government, especially given the complexities and nuances involved in this subject. Each of the individuals you mentioned—David Grusch, Lue Elizondo, and Jay Stratton—brings unique insights and experiences to the table.
David Grusch has made significant waves with his whistleblower claims, which could add a fresh perspective to UAP oversight. Lue Elizondo possesses extensive military experience and has been a strong advocate for transparency, pushing for a more open dialogue. Jay Stratton’s technical background could be invaluable for understanding and analyzing UAP phenomena.
As for making our voices heard, organizing as a community is key. We could advocate for more transparency in government research and engage in public discussions to raise awareness. Writing to our representatives, supporting UAP-related initiatives, and using social media platforms to spread information can help amplify our concerns and interests.
Ultimately, the intent behind whoever occupies such a position is crucial. They should prioritize open inquiry over secrecy, fostering a culture of investigation rather than dismissal. It’s all about advocating for serious consideration of UAPs and ensuring public engagement in the discourse.