Coulthart: “The success of Skywatcher could be a monumental turning point. The methods used by the black world to take down crafts and any entities aboard have been both immoral and utterly outrageous. However, I’ve heard that Skywatcher’s team, which is extending the invitation, has a strong moral and ethical framework, and they are committed to avoiding any form of violent takedown.”
From a recent Q&A session with Coulthart:
Coulthart: “The black world’s approach to takedowns is immoral and absolutely outrageous.”
Aleks Bush (NewsNation): “Linda from YouTube asked if the process of inviting UAPs could potentially harm whoever is aboard or piloting those crafts, and whether it is ethical.”
Coulthart: “There are two distinct issues here: what’s been occurring within the black world system is illegal, immoral, and entirely unacceptable. We’ve been inviting, rather than summoning, non-human crafts to approach us, but there have been instances where we have used high pulse microwaves to bring them down.”
Coulthart: “Hypothetically, if there is a biological entity onboard, we cannot be sure what has happened to it, but it’s reasonable to assume that if their craft is brought down violently, they could be harmed in the process. When Jake Barber engaged with an object, he sensed distress, indicating that there could be entities affected.”
Coulthart: “I’ve been informed that Skywatcher operates with a strong moral and ethical framework.”
Coulthart: “We are all hopeful that Skywatcher will successfully invite a non-human craft and perhaps even facilitate a landing and recovery.”
Coulthart: “I’ve been told, and I must stress that I can’t speak on behalf of Skywatcher, but in confidence, I’ve learned that the team is committed to maintaining a strong moral and ethical code. They will not be engaged in any violent takedowns, and they have established robust ethical guidelines for their approach.”
Coulthart: “Concerns regarding Skywatcher’s ethics are unfounded.”
Coulthart: “I’ve actually invited Alex Cloas from the Ennea Explorers Club, the mind behind Skywatcher, to join me on the show. Many people have reached out to me with what I know to be unfounded concerns about Skywatcher’s ethics.”
Coulthart: “What I informally understand from people associated with Skywatcher is that they are committed to acting with integrity. They want to distinguish their methods from the actions of the black world, emphasizing morality, friendliness, and a welcoming approach. I hope to bring the Skywatcher team on the record to clarify their plans, which would provide much-needed accountability and transparency.”
Coulthart: “If Barber’s team succeeds, it could be transformative.”
Coulthart: “I remain very optimistic about Skywatcher. Some view it as a possible CIA false flag due to Jake’s past intelligence ties, but I assure you it’s not operating under any CIA oversight. The agency would likely prefer that Jake and his team remain silent.”
Coulthart: “Skywatcher is actively attempting to invite the landing and retrieval of a non-human craft. If they succeed, it would be a transformative moment, instantly shifting the debate in an unprecedented way. I believe that one of the most positive prospects for disclosure currently lies with Jake Barber and his Skywatcher team.”
Coulthart’s discussion on the ethical implications surrounding the Skywatcher initiative raises important points about the past actions of the “black world” and sets a contrasting tone for how Skywatcher intends to operate. It’s refreshing to hear the commitment to a strong moral and ethical framework from a team aiming to engage with potential non-human entities.
The notion that past methods involved violent takedowns raises serious concerns about ethics in both extraterrestrial engagement and the broader implications for how humanity approaches such unknowns. Skywatcher’s proposed invitation, rather than coercion, sets an important precedent. It aligns with the idea that contact should be grounded in respect and goodwill rather than aggression and fear.
If Skywatcher can indeed establish contact in a non-threatening manner, it could redefine our understanding of human interaction with non-human intelligence, restoring a sense of openness and curiosity rather than hostility. This approach may lead not only to significant revelations regarding the phenomena itself but also to how we view our place in the cosmos and our responsibilities toward other sentient beings.
I share Coulthart’s optimism—if successful, this initiative could be a pivotal moment in the ongoing journey toward understanding and transparency in the realm of UAPs and beyond. It’s essential that discussions around ethics continue to evolve alongside these explorations.