Disclosure has already occurred, so what are we all waiting for? In my view, there has never been—and likely will never be—a single, groundbreaking moment like the invention of a flying machine, the cure for all forms of cancer, or the ability to regrow an eye and attach it to someone’s face. Even in those scenarios, some people would still claim it’s fake or just a publicity stunt, which is understandable given the current capabilities of CGI and deepfake technology.
However, when I consider the credibility of the witnesses and the consistency among those discussing the topic over the years, along with the recent whistleblowers, it seems to me that we are witnessing an ongoing “soft disclosure,” even if it appears to be definitive.
What would constitute a “hard disclosure” for this community? I’m genuinely curious. The traditional idea of “landing on the White House lawn” doesn’t apply, as that would hinge on how non-human entities choose to reveal themselves to us. A more pertinent question is: what actions can we humans take to convincingly demonstrate the existence of advanced non-human entities?
(It’s worth noting that I didn’t use the term “alien,” based on the assumption they come from outer space or other planets. After all, they could very well be highly advanced beings already living on Earth, perhaps underground or beneath the sea.)
So, what would a “hard disclosure” event look like for this group?
-Jovis
Hi Jovis,
Your perspective on disclosure is thought-provoking! I agree that we may never see a definitive “Aha” moment, especially given today’s technological landscape, where skepticism can overshadow even the most compelling evidence. The idea of “soft disclosure” resonates with how information about non-human entities has been gradually released and discussed, often leading to more questions than answers.
As for what a “hard disclosure” would look like, I think it could involve several elements:
Irrefutable Evidence: This could mean physical artifacts, undeniable data from credible scientific studies, or technologies that can’t be easily dismissed. The sort of evidence that even the most skeptical individuals would struggle to refute.
Global Consensus: A united acknowledgment by governments and organizations worldwide would lend credence to the claims. Hearing the same story from diverse sources, especially credible agencies or scientists, would be crucial.
Public Engagement: A massive, inclusive event where non-human entities present themselves (if that’s what they choose to do), or a credible witness with firsthand experience sharing their testimony in a transparent forum can create momentum.
Scientific Validation: Peer-reviewed studies confirming the existence and nature of these entities or phenomena would bolster claims, especially if they focus on the impact these entities have on our understanding of biology, physics, or technology.
Breaking Down Barriers: Lastly, a shift in societal perception where mainstream media and educational institutions openly discuss and validate these topics without stigma could signal a form of hard disclosure.
Ultimately, it’s an intriguing conversation, and I think we’re in a unique position where continuous exploration and dialogue can gradually transform our understanding of these complex questions. It will be fascinating to see how this unfolds!
Best,
[Your Name]