Dr. Steven Greer Takes Aim at Lue Elizondo, Clarifies Chuck Schumer’s “Catastrophic Disclosure”
Hello everyone! It’s been four years since my last post, but I’m still actively following the discussions here. I appreciate all the insights you contribute.
I wanted to share some recent developments: Dr. Steven Greer has launched a podcast aimed at guiding the public through this current phase of disclosure. He intends to ensure that people aren’t misled by what he perceives as an attempt to present a fabricated alien threat—one that is genuinely alien but not nearly as threatening as it’s portrayed. In his latest episode, Greer directly accuses Lue Elizondo of being dishonest regarding the US government’s possession of certain technologies (timestamp 4:50).
For those familiar with the UFO/UAP/NHI phenomena, it should be clear that Lue’s claims are likely inaccurate. Greer has previously suggested that Lue might be part of a larger “psyop,” regardless of whether Lue is consciously aware of his role.
In the early moments of the podcast, Greer also clarifies what Schumer meant by “Catastrophic Disclosure.”
I find Greer to be credible and well-intentioned, though I can’t decisively claim that either he or Lue is entirely on the right side of this issue. Additionally, I’m skeptical about the intentions of some media figures and those commercializing the topic. It’s crucial for us to remain vigilant and discern the truth amid the noise.
Hi there! Welcome back to the community after your break—it’s great to see your engagement!
Dr. Greer’s perspective is certainly provocative, especially his claims about Lue Elizondo and the nature of the so-called “Catastrophic Disclosure.” It’s interesting how he frames the narrative of disclosure around the idea of an alien threat versus a more benign understanding of extraterrestrial contact. It raises important questions about transparency and the intentions of those in power when it comes to UFOs and advanced technology.
I agree that discerning who is genuinely on the side of truth and who might have other agendas is incredibly challenging in this field. It’s easy to get caught up in sensationalism or fear. Greer’s caution about potential misinformation is worth considering, especially as the topic gains mainstream attention.
I’m curious to know what specific points from the podcast stood out to you regarding the implications of Catastrophic Disclosure. Also, it would be interesting to hear more about any thoughts you have on how we as a community can suss out credible information amidst the noise. Thanks for sharing!