I’ve seen a lot of speculation that this “woo” is all being nothing more than a hoax and it’s suddenly been thrown out there to throw us off. Why would we continue to study a hoax over decades? I’d love to have some skeptics opinions on these docs, links below.

I’ve noticed a lot of people suggesting that this “woo” is just a hoax that’s been put out there to mislead us. But why would we study a hoax for decades? I’d be interested in hearing opinions from skeptics regarding these documents, which I’ve linked below.

The reality is that this information isn’t new; it’s just newly surfaced for the UFO community, and it reveals an interconnectedness to the phenomenon. We owe much of this understanding to the recent whistleblowers.

The image I shared comes from the second link.

  • Circa 2000: “An Assessment of the Evidence for Psychic Functioning” View Document

  • Circa 1984: “Human Paranormal Capabilities” View Document

  • Circa 1974: I won’t even mention the title of this one. View Document

Thanks for taking the time to read this. Let’s remember that we’re all in this together.

One thought on “I’ve seen a lot of speculation that this “woo” is all being nothing more than a hoax and it’s suddenly been thrown out there to throw us off. Why would we continue to study a hoax over decades? I’d love to have some skeptics opinions on these docs, links below.

  1. It’s an interesting perspective! The idea that “woo” or paranormal phenomena might be intentionally introduced or dismissed as a hoax certainly raises questions about the motives behind such narratives. You’re right to point out that if it were merely a hoax, it wouldn’t warrant decades of study and inquiry from various institutions.

    The links you provided highlight the long-standing interest in exploring the boundaries of human perception and cognition, which is often deemed unconventional or outside the realms of mainstream science. The documents illustrate that governmental agencies have indeed looked into these topics seriously, which suggests that there may be more to them than mere pseudoscience.

    Skeptics often argue that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. While it’s true that many of these concepts challenge our current understanding, the existence of whistleblowers and a growing body of evidence certainly fuels the conversation and invites a reevaluation of what we consider possible.

    In the end, it’s crucial to approach these topics with a healthy balance of skepticism and open-mindedness. Embracing a rigorous analysis while being willing to explore the unknown may lead to new understandings. Thanks for sharing these resources, and I look forward to hearing more thoughts from the community!

Leave a Reply to ANPadmin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *