New Lue Letter to Congress Reveals Approximate Location of Bigelow UAP Facility
A significant development has emerged as Dean Johnson shares four letters sent by Representatives Burlison and Nancy Mace to Lue Elizondo, Tim Gallaudet, Michael Gold, and Michael Shellenberger following the November 2024 hearing. These letters contain a series of questions that the recipients are required to address in writing. Among them, the most intriguing is Lue’s letter, which includes new insights related to eleven key questions.
Lue’s Letter: View Here
While the full letters are available for reading, the key highlights include:
– The government has uncovered new physics through the study of UAPs and is utilizing these findings in defense projects.
– Lockheed Martin sought to dispose of UAP materials due to a lack of new discoveries and likely budget cuts after 9/11.
– Representative Steny Hoyer proposed allocating $10 million for Bigelow Aerospace to construct a facility at Patuxent River Naval Air Station to house UAPs. Lue toured the hangar during its construction, but the CIA and Air Force subsequently blocked the transfer. This facility is designated as SAP-F, meeting the criteria for Special Access Programs.
Approximate Location (exact hangar unknown): View Here
A “UAP Security Classification Guide” exists, outlining classified elements of UAPs and their classification levels, along with a document titled “UAP Collection Requirements” from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
In 2004, the government held a week-long conference to determine whether to disclose information about UAPs and ultimately decided against it. Notably, this conference was sponsored by the White House.
This revelation raises intriguing questions about former President Bush’s awareness of UAP issues, alongside whistleblower statements like those from Bill Uhouse, who mentioned that their NDA ended in 2003. This could suggest that the government was planning for potential disclosure in 2004, with NDAs arising around that timeframe.
For further insight, check out this video featuring Eric Puthoff, who discusses the events from that conference and mentions financial motivations, as companies might have sued the government for favoring certain contractors (perhaps Lockheed): Watch Here.
Link to PDF Letters:
– Set of Letters Overview
– Lue Elizondo Q&A
– Michael Shellenberger Q&A
– Tim Gallaudet Q&A
– Michael Gold Q&A
This post delves into some intriguing developments regarding UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) and government transparency. The new letters from Lue Elizondo and other representatives illuminate the ongoing inquiry into UAPs, highlighting the government’s interest in the physics discovered from these phenomena and their implications for defense technology.
It’s particularly noteworthy that Lockheed’s inability to extract further insights from UAP materials led to the proposed collaboration with Bigelow Aerospace, only for that initiative to be obstructed by both the CIA and the Air Force. The fact that the facility at Patuxent River Naval Air Station is recognized under Special Access Programs (SAP) implies a significant level of secrecy surrounding UAP investigations.
The mention of a UAP Security Classification Guide and associated documents from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence further underscores the complexities and sensitivities involved in the disclosure of information about UAPs.
The historical context you provide regarding a 2004 government conference, which allegedly considered disclosure, raises questions about the motivations and challenges behind past decisions. It’s fascinating to consider how public sentiment and corporate interests might have played a role in shaping these discussions.
Overall, the series of letters and the information they contain suggest that we are only scratching the surface of what the government knows about UAPs. Public discourse on the subject is certainly heating up, and it will be interesting to see how these revelations influence ongoing investigations and ultimately the public’s understanding of UAP phenomena. Thank you for sharing these updates and insights!