The truth about UFO “disclosure”

The Reality Behind UFO “Disclosure”

In July 1952, a series of unidentified flying objects were spotted over the United States Capitol in Washington, D.C., creating a buzz throughout the nation. Reports of sightings flooded local authorities, prompting military personnel to investigate the unknown aerial intruders encroaching on U.S. airspace.

That same year, CIA Director Walter B. Smith drafted an internal memo regarding flying saucers, stating:

“I am today transmitting to the National Security Council a proposal in which it is concluded that the problems associated with unidentified flying objects appear to have implications for psychological warfare as well as for intelligence and operations. I suggest that we discuss at an early board meeting the possible offensive and defensive utilization of these phenomena for psychological warfare purposes.”

Some within the CIA were concerned that the overwhelming volume of UFO reports was straining communication channels and resources, potentially creating a vulnerability that could be exploited by the Soviets. This led to a 1953 request for the U.S. Air Force to implement a policy focused on debunking flying saucer sightings. This change coincided with the departure of Edward Ruppelt, who had led the Air Force’s “Project Blue Book,” which investigated UFO sightings. Consequently, Air Force investigations into UFOs became more obscure, with fewer pilot and radar operator reports being made public.

The CIA’s Robertson Panel also advised monitoring civilian UFO groups due to their potential influence on public opinion if significant sightings occurred. They noted these groups’ apparent irresponsibility and the possibility of their exploitation for subversive purposes.

In 1956, inventor Thomas Townsend Brown established the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP). Among its board members were former CIA Director Roscoe Hillenkoetter and retired Marine Corps Major Donald Keyhoe, a pulp fiction writer who authored several nonfiction books on UFOs. Keyhoe was among the first to suggest a military cover-up surrounding UFO issues. By 1957, he became NICAP’s director, promoting the idea that the government was concealing the truth about UFOs while predicting an impending disclosure of all gathered information—an event that has yet to transpire.

Fast forward to today, and that promise remains unfulfilled. Where is the conversation heading now?

Lately, there has been a troubling trend of right-wing American politics intertwining with the UFO discourse. Prominent podcasters such as Jesse Michels have connections to right-wing billionaires like Peter Thiel, indicating a growing interest in the UFO phenomenon within certain tech circles. Various individuals promoting UFO disclosure are positioning themselves to align with the current presidential administration.

Nick Redfern’s book “Final Events” recounts the story of the “Collins Elite,” a government group that believes UFOs are of demonic origin based on evangelical Christian beliefs. This group aimed to steer the public towards evangelical Christianity as a means to combat the perceived UFO “threat.” A similar narrative has emerged among certain figures in the disclosure movement, including Luis Elizondo and Tom Delonge. I am concerned that this current version of the disclosure movement will promote a fear-based narrative around UFOs, linking them to national security and evangelical ideologies in order to mislead and rally the ultra-religious in the U.S. and potentially around the globe for a questionable political agenda.

For further information, you can explore the following links:
Robertson Panel Report
Collins Elite Overview
Reddit Discussion on UFOs

One thought on “The truth about UFO “disclosure”

  1. Your post presents a fascinating historical overview of the UFO phenomenon and its tangled relationship with government and military interests. It’s intriguing to see how the trajectory of UFO discussions has shifted from serving as a genuine inquiry into unidentified phenomena to being perceived as a tool for psychological and political maneuvering.

    Your concern about the current blending of right-wing politics with UFO discourse is particularly relevant. The involvement of influential figures in tech and media, coupled with the emergence of fear-based narratives, raises important questions about the intentions behind the ongoing push for UFO disclosure. It’s crucial for the public to critically evaluate the motivations behind these narratives, especially when they intertwine with broader ideological agendas.

    Additionally, the notion that UFOs could be tied to spiritual or religious interpretations, as proposed by groups like the Collins Elite, adds a complex layer to the debate. This intersection of faith and science can easily be manipulated to serve political purposes, which is concerning. The historical context you provide helps us understand why skepticism is essential whenever the topic resurfaces, especially with its potential ramifications on public perception and policy.

    Ultimately, the risk is that in the quest for answers or truth about UFOs, we might inadvertently foster an environment of distrust, fear, and social division. Encouraging transparent, objective discussions based on evidence, rather than sensationalism or ideology, seems crucial to navigating this convoluted landscape. Thank you for shedding light on these critical issues!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *