A fascinating discovery has been made in Nazca: a Mantis NHI mummy, along with a reptilian specimen containing three eggs. Interestingly, there are hints of CIA involvement in this case.
While many are familiar with the Nazca mummies, the Instituto Inkari Cusco, which oversees these investigations, has found numerous additional mummies in the same vicinity. You can view a comprehensive collection of these finds, including images, X-rays, 3D models, and more, on their website under the Discoveries tab.
One particularly intriguing specimen is the Mantis known as Nukarri. Witnesses, including John Blitch and Ricky Sorrells (who observed the Mantis during the 2008 Stephenville sighting), have reported on its unique morphology—which is notably suited for withstanding the G-forces often associated with UAPs due to its lightweight structure.
Additionally, the reptilian species identified has three eggs inside. You can explore more details about this specimen on the Instituto’s website.
The timeline of these discoveries is also compelling. The initial specimen was found at the end of 2015 by treasure hunters. After the Instituto Inkari Cusco reached out to them in 2016, scientific analyses began in March 2017, following a successful crowdfunding campaign. Coincidentally, in December 2017, the New York Times published a groundbreaking article about Pentagon UFO footage, which many speculate was connected.
An interesting note: a character resembling the NHI from these discoveries appeared in Steven Spielberg’s “Close Encounters of the Third Kind.” It’s worth considering that Chase Brandon, a CIA operative who worked with Spielberg and had connections in South America, may have had prior knowledge of these mummies as far back as the 1970s. His recent fiction book, “The Cryptos Conundrum,” adds another layer to this intriguing narrative.
It seems plausible that the CIA has known about the existence of these mummies since the 1970s. As they see the public rediscovery and validation of these findings, disclosing this information may have become inevitable, culminating in the New York Times article and its aftermath.
Additionally, there has been some confusion regarding a mummy that resembles a doll; it is crucial to clarify that these mummies were found in a DHL box at a Peruvian airport and are separate from the toys posed to mislead the public. It raises questions about whether these dolls were replicas sold at inflated prices as originals or if there’s an effort to obscure the truth surrounding the mummies.
Despite certain attempts to cloud the narrative, the mummies presented by the Instituto have been verified as authentic through various scientific analyses, including confirmation by Dr. Zalce, a forensic doctor at the Mexican Navy.
For further information, you can explore more about these discoveries and the ongoing research on their website.
This post presents some intriguing claims about the Nazca mummies, including the Mantis NHI and the reptilian specimen. While the allure of potential extraterrestrial life certainly captures the imagination, it’s essential to approach such claims with scrutiny and a critical eye.
The connections drawn with the CIA and Spielberg, while fascinating, require more substantial evidence to be considered credible. Theories about government agencies concealing or manipulating information are common in discussions about UFOs and extraterrestrials, but without concrete proof, they remain speculative.
It’s also worth noting that many claims surrounding alien mummies have been met with skepticism from the scientific community. The mummies found in Nazca and reported as genuine have faced accusations of being hoaxes or misidentified artifacts. Scientific analysis is crucial, and any authentic discoveries would ideally be subjected to peer-reviewed scrutiny.
The mention of dolls and replicas adds another layer of complexity to the narrative. It’s essential for the public to differentiate between genuine findings and potential fabrications, as misinformation can muddy the waters of legitimate scientific inquiry.
Ultimately, while the topic is undeniably fascinating, a healthy dose of skepticism and reliance on robust scientific evidence will be vital in navigating these claims. Continued research and open discussions within the scientific community will be the best way to discern fact from fiction in this captivating area of study.