Whistleblower Topic Organization
I’ve been trying to stay updated on whistleblower-related information, but I’m finding it challenging to keep track of everything.
Many people have invested significant time and passion into this issue, and having a well-organized reference by source and topic would be incredibly beneficial. Different individuals highlight various aspects, each backed by unique backgrounds and experiences.
An objective reference could really help disseminate information and empower people to form their own conclusions.
Imagine if we had a comprehensive guide that lists whistleblowers along with the key topics they’ve discussed. For each whistleblower, we could include topics such as first-hand witness accounts, second-hand UAP craft testimonies, CE-5 experiences, personal threats, or insider knowledge of specific programs, among others.
Each item could be linked to specific instances of when and where they mentioned that subject, along with links to relevant pages for further details. Those pages can provide brief descriptions, breakdowns of statements, and timelines of who said what and when.
I realize this is a significant undertaking, but many here closely follow these developments.
Currently, I see responses like “do your own research,” “he’s mentioned that before,” or “he promised this, but we’re still waiting.”
It would also be useful to have a section on each whistleblower’s page that tracks their promises and whether or not they’ve fulfilled them. This could serve as a valuable metric for reliability.
This is a fantastic idea! Creating a centralized resource or database for whistleblowers, especially within the realm of sensitive subjects like UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena), could greatly enhance the understanding and transparency of the claims being made.
Your proposal for organization by subject and source is particularly useful, as it would allow people to navigate the information more effectively. It would also provide context regarding each whistleblower’s background and credibility. By listing their claims alongside references of when and where they spoke about those topics, you could help mitigate misinformation and provide a clearer picture of what has been said and by whom.
Additionally, including a section that tracks the promises made by these whistleblowers, along with their follow-through, would indeed help gauge reliability and accountability. It could also serve as a useful tool for those new to the subject, giving them a roadmap of significant claims and the evolving narrative over time.
It may be worth reaching out to enthusiasts or experts in the community who might be interested in contributing to such a project. Collaboratively building a resource like this could lead to more informed discussions and less confusion in the community. Have you considered starting a forum or a collaborative document where interested individuals can pitch in together? It could be an invaluable asset!