Strange Theories About UFOs
Is it just me, or have there been a lot of bizarre theories about UFOs circulating lately?
It seems like there’s a trend emerging that connects UFOs to psionics, telepathy, or that idea of “letting your mind take flight,” which honestly seems a bit extreme.
My initial thought is: since when has there not been some sort of “way out there” theory about UFOs?
I’d argue that one of the most logical and credible UFO theories of all time was the idea that “Martians are visiting us out of fear of our nuclear weapons.” It made sense: Mars is a real planet with an atmosphere, seasons, and was once believed to have canals. Plus, it’s not that far away, and our nuclear arms could pose a threat to them.
Too bad that theory turned out to be completely wrong. There are no canals on Mars, for starters.
The takeaway? Just because a theory sounds logical and plausible doesn’t mean it’s true. Conversely, just because a theory seems counterintuitive or implausible doesn’t automatically make it false.
Logical theories are often easier to validate with evidence. Gathering evidence for ideas that challenge common sense is quite difficult.
Therefore, I don’t subscribe to the notion that “psionics”—which can refer to telepathy, remote viewing, or macrokinesis, depending on who’s discussing it—is “too out there” simply because it appears implausible. As we know, dismissing ideas based on their perceived credibility isn’t a valid scientific approach.
I had two personal experiences with precognition during college while on an LSD trip at Laguna Beach, CA. I was sitting on the beach at dawn and thought, “Someone will ride by on a horse.” Given Laguna’s development, that seemed highly improbable. However, just a few minutes later, a horse and a rider appeared. So, I thought, “That’s either really strange or really the acid.” As I got up to walk back to my car, I thought, “I’ll run into someone from work” (I was a bartender at the time). Minutes later, I encountered a Mexican dishwasher from that restaurant walking toward me.
That said, I don’t identify as a “believer” in UFO-related psionics, as the specific claim of “summoning” or piloting UFOs still awaits substantial evidence—evidence supposedly coming from SkyWatcher.
Skepticism can be framed this way: until you have compelling reasons or a personal need to adopt a belief, it’s best to just let it be. Don’t resist it; simply stay indifferent.
In his lengthy interview, Barber discusses an emotional impact he felt was externally caused, which isn’t the kind of psionics we’re currently considering. However, I do believe in that form of psionics—like alien telepathy or “alien strangeness”—because such evidence is prevalent in the UFO literature dating back to the Hill abduction, if not earlier. The documentation is so thorough that the UK Ministry of Defence’s UAP report attempted to explain some effects as possibly caused by microwave radiation. As a result, I view the skepticism toward psionics being “too out there” as indicative of a misunderstanding of the historical evidence regarding these phenomena.
The link between UFOs and mind-altering effects is arguably more robust than the idea that “aliens” arrive in advanced, tangible technologies from distant planets (the same goes for time-traveling future humans). Yet, surprisingly, many in the UFO community still find the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis (ETH)—now redefined to include aliens from far-off galaxies arriving in warp drives due to our nuclear stockpile—credible.
Returning to the idea of not adopting beliefs… Along with skepticism about psionics, there’s also criticism directed at those who discuss it. Critics claim the speakers themselves are “too out there” and deserve reprimand.
I personally disregard claims made by figures
You’ve brought up some fascinating points about the spectrum of UFO theories and the nature of belief in the unknown. It’s true that throughout history, there have been a multitude of theories related to UFOs, many of which seem peculiar or far-fetched. Your perspective on the logical yet incorrect theories, like the one regarding Martians being fearful of nuclear weapons, highlights how our understanding of the universe can shift dramatically as new evidence comes to light.
I can appreciate your skepticism towards claims of psionics and telepathy, especially since they often lack the kind of tangible evidence that can be used to confirm more conventional theories. Your personal experiences with precognition are intriguing and certainly add a layer of complexity to the discussion. They illustrate how subjective experiences can challenge our understanding of reality, even if they’re anecdotal.
Regarding the criticisms of the proponents of psionics and similar theories, it’s essential to distinguish between open-mindedness and blind acceptance. As you pointed out, certainty, especially in the absence of evidence, can be detrimental to the scientific process. It’s refreshing to see that you prioritize evidence before forming beliefs, regardless of how implausible those beliefs may seem.
I’d also touch on the importance of community dynamics in the ufology space. It’s interesting how certain figures garner followings and how their confidence can sway public perception, regardless of the scientific rigor behind their claims. This phenomenon makes it all the more critical for individuals to approach such claims with a healthy dose of skepticism and a commitment to seeking evidence.
In sum, you’re advocating for a balanced approach: remain curious and open to all possibilities while maintaining rigorous skepticism when it comes to extraordinary claims. It’s a commendable stance in a field that can easily fall into sensationalism. I look forward to seeing how this discussion evolves as more evidence, regardless of its nature, surfaces in the ongoing exploration of UFOs and their implications.