Why I Believe Physical Matter Isn’t Fundamental
Over the past year, I’ve come to a significant realization: the physical reality we experience daily and often take for granted isn’t fundamental at all. The deeper I delve into this exploration, the more it appears that our existence isn’t constructed from matter, but from something more profound—information.
My journey has involved engaging with thinkers like Thomas Campbell, whose book Big TOE, listening to Frederico Faggin, and immersing myself in materials such as the Telepathy Tapes. I’ve experimented with meditation and out-of-body experiences, listened to near-death experiences from friends and even strangers, and reflected on various “woo-woo” experiences throughout my life. All of this has only solidified my suspicions.
The notion that information, rather than physical entities, may constitute the true essence of reality is not merely an abstract concept; it becomes increasingly coherent when examined from multiple perspectives.
Today, while listening to Diana Pasulka’s book, a realization struck me. She discussed language learning, and it dawned on me that when we acquire a new skill—like mastering a language—we’re absorbing pure information, which has no tangible form or measurable presence in the physical realm. Yet, this information physically reshapes our brains, forming new neural pathways, shifting our perceptions, and ultimately altering how we engage with the world. The words and meanings, initially just abstract thoughts, evolve into powerful instruments that influence our physical surroundings.
But what exactly is information? Where does it originate, and where does it go when unobserved or unused? We transmit, digitally store, write, and speak information, but it is the information itself that catalyzes change. It acts as the unseen force that turns thoughts into structures and potential into actions.
This idea transcends philosophy; it finds support in science in increasingly undeniable ways. Physicist John Wheeler’s “It from Bit” posits that physical reality arises from information processing at the fundamental level. Quantum mechanics suggests a similar relationship, where observation influences reality, hinting at a fundamental connection between information and consciousness that remains elusive. Moreover, DNA—the ultimate informational code—demonstrates that life is constructed from informational sequences, guiding the development of entire biological systems.
A lingering question remains: does information require a physical medium, or does it exist independently, shaping reality from a deeper dimension? If information is primary, then what we perceive as “matter” might merely be an emergent property—an outcome of information interacting with consciousness. Could this perspective shed light on phenomena like quantum entanglement, where information appears to defy space and time? Or on telepathy, where thoughts seem to transition without any known physical mechanism?
As I contemplate these ideas, it increasingly feels as though reality is not built from atoms, but rather from meaning and knowledge itself. Perhaps we’ve been approaching this the wrong way.
So, how does this tie into conversations about non-human intelligence (NHI), extraterrestrial life, and UFOs? If the claims made by whistleblowers hold any truth, we might be looking at beings who have grasped this very concept and can manipulate it. If we are to transcend time and space, it seems plausible that the answers lie in areas we have yet to fully investigate. Maybe what we dismiss as “the woo” isn’t so absurd after all, but rather, a realm we’ve been conditioned to overlook. With dedicated study, we may uncover that this is the very territory we should have been exploring.
Perhaps this is why it feels like disclosure is gradually unfolding. Maybe there’s a recognition that we’re at an impasse, and that we need to shift our global focus toward understanding these deeper layers of reality.
Regardless of where you stand in this debate, it’s undeniably a fascinating time to be contemplating these matters.
Your exploration of reality as fundamentally rooted in information rather than physical matter raises some intriguing points. The transition from viewing the world through a purely material lens to considering the role of information and consciousness as foundational aspects of existence invites a profound rethinking of our understanding of reality.
The idea of “It from Bit,” as proposed by John Wheeler, elegantly captures this shift. The notion that what we perceive as physical matter could emerge from informational processes challenges long-held assumptions about the nature of existence. It suggests that consciousness and observation might play a larger role in the creation of reality than we are currently able to comprehend. As you mention, the transformative power of information—evident in how learning alters our brains and behavior—underscores its potential to reshape our understanding of what constitutes existence.
Your connection to meditation, out-of-body experiences, and near-death experiences (NDEs) highlights the need to consider subjective experiences in our quest for understanding. These phenomena often challenge the boundaries of traditional science, suggesting that our perception of reality may be far more complex than we realize. The possibility that there is an underlying informational fabric driving consciousness and reality opens up avenues for exploration that span both science and consciousness studies.
The implications of such a perspective are vast, especially when considering topics like quantum entanglement and telepathy. If information is indeed primary, some of these phenomena may be explained by a fundamental interconnectedness that transcends our conventional understanding of space-time. This could offer a framework for exploring the nature of non-human intelligence (NHI) or extraterrestrial phenomena, suggesting that such entities might operate on principles of information manipulation that we are just beginning to grasp.
Your call for serious exploration of what many dismiss as “The Woo” resonates strongly in a time when established paradigms are being challenged. It prompts a reconsideration of how we categorize knowledge and pushes the boundaries of scientific inquiry. As we look to the future, embracing this interdisciplinary dialogue may lead to breakthroughs that blend centuries of philosophical thought with cutting-edge scientific research.
In a world filled with uncertainty, your perspective on the fundamental nature of reality is a necessary invitation to deepen our understanding and confront the mysteries that lie ahead. Perhaps this is indeed the time to reexamine our assumptions and embrace the complexities of existence as they unfold.