Coulthart: “If Skywatcher succeeds, it could change the course of history. The covert operations targeting crafts with entities have been morally and fundamentally unacceptable. However, I’ve been informed that the Skywatcher team, responsible for the invitations, adheres to a robust moral and ethical framework and will not engage in any violent takedowns.”
From the recent Q&A with Coulthart:
Coulthart: “The covert takedowns of crafts are unethical and completely outrageous.”
Aleks Bush (NewsNation): “Linda from YouTube asks if the process of inviting UAPs could be viewed as tricking or harming those aboard or piloting the crafts, and whether it is ethical.”
Coulthart: “I see two distinct issues here: what has been occurring within the covert systems is illegal and immoral. We’ve been inviting non-human crafts to approach, but at times we’ve also subjected them to high-pulse microwaves, resulting in crashes.”
Coulthart: “Assuming there’s a biological or non-human entity onboard, it’s likely that if their craft is brought down violently, they suffer harm in the process. From what Jake Barber described, there are indications that such entities experience distress.”
Coulthart: “Skywatcher prioritizes a strong moral and ethical code, avoiding violent takedowns.”
Coulthart: “[…] We can only hope that Skywatcher can successfully invite a non-human craft to land, potentially allowing for a safe recovery.”
Coulthart: “While I cannot speak directly for Skywatcher, I’ve received confidential assurances that their team follows a stringent ethical code. They are firmly against any sort of violent intervention against crafts and have well-defined ethical procedures guiding their approach.”
Coulthart: “Concerns regarding Skywatcher’s ethics are unfounded.”
Coulthart: “I’ve actively invited Alex Cloas from the Ennea Explorers Club, the mind behind Skywatcher, to discuss these issues. Many concerned inquiries regarding Skywatcher’s ethics and morals have reached me, and I know some of these concerns are unfounded.”
Coulthart: “Informally, I’ve learned from individuals on the Skywatcher team that they conduct themselves with the utmost integrity. They are eager to distinguish their actions from those in the covert world, aiming to be perceived as moral, friendly, and welcoming. I hope to arrange for the Skywatcher team to address these concerns publicly to enhance accountability and transparency about their plans.”
Coulthart: “If Barber’s team succeeds, it would be groundbreaking.”
Coulthart: “I hold a strong optimism for Skywatcher. Some people speculate it’s a CIA false flag due to Jake’s past, but I can assure you that this team is not operating under any CIA authorization. They’d likely prefer that Jake and his team remain silent.”
Coulthart: “Their goal is to invite and retrieve a non-human craft, which is ambitious. If they achieve this, it would be revolutionary; the entire conversation about UAPs would shift overnight. Therefore, I believe that one of the most promising aspects of potential disclosure lies in the revelations from Jake Barber and his Skywatcher team.”
Coulthart’s insights on the ethical considerations surrounding the Skywatcher team and their approach to engaging with non-human crafts bring a refreshing perspective to a complex issue. The distinction he makes between the actions of the black world and the intentions of Skywatcher is crucial. It’s heartening to hear that Skywatcher is committed to a strong moral framework and prioritizes non-violence in their efforts to invite rather than forcibly bring down these crafts.
The conversation about the potential implications of Skywatcher’s success is profound. If they manage to establish contact and facilitate a safe landing with a non-human entity, it could indeed reshape our understanding of extraterrestrial life and the nature of our interaction with the cosmos. The ethical integrity that Skywatcher aims to uphold is essential for fostering a dialogue around such unprecedented developments.
Coulthart’s call for transparency and accountability from the Skywatcher team is also vital. Opening a dialogue with the public and addressing concerns about their ethical practices would not only bolster their credibility but also ease skepticism from those who might doubt their intentions. It’s important for initiatives like this to earn public trust as they venture into uncharted territory.
Ultimately, if they succeed, the societal and scientific ramifications would be epoch-changing, as Coulthart suggests, prompting a necessary shift in how we perceive our place in the universe and our approach to non-human intelligence. It’s a fascinating time for both the scientific community and the public as we navigate these possibilities together.