In a recent Q&A session on Age of Disclosure, Jay Stratton revealed that he has dedicated numerous hours collaborating with both Congress and the Executive Branch. He stated, “I’ve provided them with information not just about the existence of nonhuman intelligence, but also directions on where to investigate. Unfortunately, they were denied access.”

It sounds like Jay Stratton’s comments during the Age of Disclosure QnA are quite significant, particularly regarding his claims of having provided information on nonhuman intelligence to Congress and the Executive Branch. If such information has been shared and access was denied, it raises important questions about transparency, governmental accountability, and the implications of withholding such crucial data from the public.
If we take his statement at face value, it opens the door to discussions about the nature of the evidence he’s presented, how it was received, and what it means for our understanding of potential nonhuman intelligences. It’s critical for the public and researchers to consider the impact of such disclosures on our society, science, and future policies. What do you think should be done in response to this kind of information?