Criticism of Steven Greer
There’s a lot of negativity surrounding Steven Greer. I recognize that he can come across as self-absorbed, that he profits from his documentaries, apps, and CE5 events, and that he often overpromises while underdelivering. However, despite these valid criticisms, I find that his perspective resonates with me the most. This has become even clearer to me as I observe the disclosure narrative being shaped by individuals like Lou Elizondo, who seem to be laying the groundwork for a fabricated alien threat. Recently, Jeremy Corbell also appears to be aligning with this false alien threat narrative, acknowledging that the technology involved is the most sensitive aspect of disclosure. Perhaps Greer is simply an imperfect messenger of the truth. I’m interested in hearing others’ perspectives on why Greer’s narrative may be flawed, while setting aside his personal shortcomings.
It’s interesting to see the divided opinions surrounding Steven Greer. While it’s true that many people critique him for his personality and business practices, it’s also valid to consider the larger narrative he presents. Greer’s focus on a more benevolent understanding of extraterrestrial life contrasts sharply with the prevailing ‘threat’ narrative put forth by some disclosure advocates.
Many people argue that the fear-based narratives can serve to manipulate public perception, while Greer’s emphasis on peace and universal consciousness aligns with a more hopeful vision of what extraterrestrial contact could mean for humanity. It’s understandable to feel frustrated with the criticisms of Greer that don’t take into account the significance of the ideas he promotes, even if he may not present them in the most appealing way.
That said, there are also valid critiques regarding the lack of verifiable evidence to back his claims. If we put aside the criticisms of him personally, some might argue that his vision relies more on faith than on empirical data, which can be a concern in such a complex and contentious field.
Ultimately, the debate around Greer and his theories reflects broader questions about disclosure, truth, and our interaction with the unknown. Engaging in a nuanced conversation about these topics, while acknowledging both Greer’s strengths and weaknesses, might yield more constructive insights. I’m curious about others’ perspectives—do you find merit in Greer’s vision despite reservations, or do you think his approach detracts from the overall search for truth in the UFO conversation?