Have the floodgates of disinformation and misinformation ever been wider than they are today?
I grew up fascinated by UFOs and the Roswell conspiracy, always feeling that the U.S. government was hiding something. After a hiatus, I became re-engaged with the topic following the 2017 New York Times article and the release of the three infamous FLIR videos, along with the work of organizations like To The Stars Academy.
Initially, I believed that Luis Elizondo was a patriot acting with honesty and transparency. I’ve always resonated with Leslie Kean’s perspective and felt that the descriptions of various non-human intelligences were “going too far.” The hard evidence just hasn’t been there. I also align with Admiral Wilson’s famous words shared by Eric Davis in the Wilson Leak: “UFOs are real, abductions are not!”
However, after years of progress, it feels like the conversation is being hijacked for profit and ulterior motives. Many of the new “whistleblowers” that were promised seem questionable at best. Steven Greer’s witnesses have often appeared dubious, and some have even resurfaced on Shawn Ryan’s platform, to the dismay of many (like the “slab guy”). Now, I see Ross Coulthart, someone I previously respected, presenting individuals discussing telepathy. The recent “egg” video is troubling to me, and he even featured a psychic medium from the Pentagon.
I can’t help but feel that much of this is not credible. It surprised me that Elizondo found common ground with the “egg guy” and the recent obsession with “psyonics” in this realm. Even James Fox, who has done commendable work, included a “witness” in his latest documentary, “The Program,” who claimed to have assassinated a blue alien. When this topic was broached, Fox reportedly threatened to walk off the set.
What I’m curious about is whether anyone else thinks there’s a concerted effort to saturate the conversation with nonsense. Are people actually buying into this? Because I genuinely am not.
How much has Ross Coulthart compromised his credibility?
Am I alone in feeling that this is a recent, deliberate “disruption” designed to confuse us with former DOD/Pentagon/Intelligence professionals?
I’d love to hear your thoughts—agree or disagree?
You raise some compelling points, and I completely understand your frustration with the direction the UFO discourse seems to be taking. There’s a feeling among many long-time enthusiasts that things have become increasingly chaotic, especially with the rise of sensationalism and questionable claims.
It does seem like the influx of new voices claiming “whistleblower” status has led to a lot of misinformation and disinformation being presented as credible testimony. The enthusiasm that came with the initial revelations, like the NYT article and the FLIR videos, is now muddied by narratives that seem more about entertainment or profit than genuine transparency. The distinction you make about the positive early momentum being hijacked for ulterior motives is an important one to highlight.
Regarding Ross Coulhart and others who have seemingly shifted their focus, it appears many are caught between the desire for genuine revelation and the demands of an audience that craves ever more dramatic stories. However, as you pointed out with the instance of the “psychic medium” and the “egg” video, it can feel as if the line between credible investigation and sensationalism has blurred significantly. This kind of “disruption” you mention could be seen as a tactic to distract and disillusion those who seek genuine answers, making it harder to sift through what is real and what is fabrication.
In terms of credibility, many of these figures may find their reputations at stake, particularly if they continue to align themselves with increasingly fringe claims. I think a lot of people, both longtime followers of the phenomenon and casual observers, are becoming more discerning and critical. It’s important for the community to hold advocates and influencers accountable and to support those who prioritize integrity over hype.
So, no, you’re not alone in your concerns; many feel similarly. The search for truth in this subject has always been complicated, but it seems now more than ever we need to remain vigilant against misinformation while also maintaining a sense of curiosity about the unknown. It will be interesting to see how this landscape evolves and whether genuine discourse can prevail amidst the noise.