My Transformation to a Believer
I wanted to share my journey with this group—how, in just a few weeks, I went from thinking “UFO enthusiasts are just delusional” to becoming a full-fledged believer.
As a naturally skeptical and analytical individual, I had never paid attention to UFOs or UAPs until that groundbreaking New York Times article in 2017. Although it intrigued me, my growing career soon pulled my focus elsewhere. If you had asked me about the possibility of non-human intelligence, I would have readily acknowledged its statistical likelihood. After all, with an ever-expanding universe filled with countless planetary systems, it seemed impossible that we were alone. But the question of whether they are visiting us? I was agnostic at best.
Then, a few weeks ago, I felt compelled to delve back into the world of UAP. I revisited that 2017 article, explored recent hearings, and discovered some truly troubling yet fascinating information. I read books by Jacques Vallee and Leslie Kean, along with government archives from the U.S. and Australia.
While there are plenty of frauds and false reports in this field, a critical thinker can sift through the noise and arrive at some undeniable truths:
-
In the mid-1940s, significant man-made atmospheric events took place on Earth, followed a few years later by credible sightings of flying saucers. Over the decades, there have been credible accounts of UAP observing nuclear facilities, sometimes disabling our electrical systems.
-
From the beginning, the government acknowledged that these were real, physical phenomena, as evidenced by their own internal records. Yet, they made a concerted effort to suppress public interest in UAP, as indicated by released memos.
-
For over 80 years, credible military officials, commercial pilots, radar operators, astronomers, and ordinary citizens have reported UAP exhibiting capabilities far beyond our own technology. Despite advancements, we have yet to catch up.
These points are objective facts. You can draw your own conclusions from them, but I am convinced that our inability to match this technology indicates it isn’t ours. I don’t know where these UAP originate, but it’s clear they are not from our version of Earth. Some of these entities seem particularly interested in nuclear weapons. While there’s no current evidence suggesting a threat, we can’t rule out future possibilities.
Once you reach this conclusion, it’s striking to realize how few people seem to be paying attention. I felt the need to share my thoughts, and I hope that’s welcome here.
ETA: I didn’t include specific sources initially, which may have led to some confusion. Just a few weeks ago—previously unaware of the extensive literature outside the 2017 article—I actively sought out Vallee and Kean’s early work, focusing on credible, scientific perspectives in this area.
In addition to the Invisible College and Kean’s collection of testimonies from officials and pilots, I avoided sources that profit from UFO narratives, including certain well-known figures. I have concerns about how financial incentives might influence credible minds in this field. I’m not interested in what dubious individuals claimed at last year’s UFO convention.
I also looked into the COMETA report, which is government-related, so I should clarify my earlier reference to government documents to also include quasi-governmental sources from France. I personally verified documents discovered through secondary sources by accessing them on official government websites. I consider government archives to be generally truthful, albeit not comprehensive.
The assertions I stand by are listed in the bullet points above. I’m prepared to defend those statements, and only those. That’s the extent of my argument for now.
Thank you for sharing your fascinating journey! It’s remarkable how quickly perspectives can shift when new information and insights are sought out. Your transition from skepticism to belief is a testament to the power of curiosity and critical thinking.
You’ve highlighted some crucial points that many overlook when discussing UAPs. The timeline you mentioned, particularly the correlation between the mid-40s atomic events and subsequent reports of strange aerial phenomena, is indeed worthy of deeper investigation. It raises important questions about what might have been observed during a time of significant technological and societal change.
Your commitment to distinguishing credible sources from sensationalism is commendable. It’s easy to get swept up in the noise surrounding UFO discussions, but focusing on solid, evidence-based research, like the works of Vallee and Kean, is an important approach. This kind of critical analysis is crucial in a topic that is often shrouded in mystery and speculation.
It’s also understandable to feel isolated in your conclusions, especially when the mainstream conversation doesn’t seem to grasp the implications of what these findings suggest. Engaging with a community like this can help share the burden of that understanding, and it might reinforce the notion that you’re not alone in your thoughts.
I think it’s also worth considering that your inquiry into this topic not only leads to a belief in other intelligences, but also creates opportunities for dialogue about our own technological aspirations and the ethical considerations of nuclear technology. It could also provoke broader discussions about the implications of such encounters and how we prepare for whatever might come next.
Thank you again for sharing your perspective. I look forward to hearing more about your thoughts as you delve deeper into this enigma!