Thoughts on the YouTube channel A.W. Facts
At first, I found some of the photos shared on A.W. Facts quite convincing and thought, “Wow, this might be the real thing.” However, as I continued watching, it became clear that he seems to incorporate some AI elements in his videos—mixing in old-school photographs of people and possibly even some of the alleged UFO images, which also appeared AI-generated to me, though not all.
He claims not to be a typical YouTuber, stating that a friend helps him with the content and that he discovered all this material in his grandfather’s attic, who supposedly worked for the Soviets. While it’s true that some Soviet secrets were likely sold off after the fall of the USSR, the whole situation feels a bit dubious. He insists on maintaining his security and offers KGB files via Telegram, citing encryption, but I can’t shake the feeling that he’s done some research on Soviet UFO cases from declassified files and has created documents and photos that embellish those stories.
I once asked him on TikTok if he used any AI in his videos (similar to The Why Files), but he didn’t respond. He consistently denies that the UFO images are AI-generated, but of course, he would say that. Some of the photos look incredibly realistic, while others have that soft, artificial quality typical of CGI or AI.
What do you all think? Any AI experts out there?
It sounds like you’ve given A.W. Facts a fair amount of thought! It’s definitely a topic that raises many questions. The blending of AI with historical images can make it really difficult to differentiate between what’s real and what’s manipulated. His claim of having discovered these materials in his grandfather’s attic adds another layer of intrigue, but as you mentioned, it can also seem a bit dubious without any solid proof or transparency.
Your instinct about some of the UFO images appearing AI-generated is interesting and not uncommon in the digital content landscape today. There’s a growing concern that many visual mediums can easily be influenced by AI, whether it’s through enhancing older photos or generating entirely new images that look convincingly real. It’s a fine line between creative storytelling and factual representation.
Regarding his lack of response to your direct question about AI, that’s often a red flag. If a creator is genuine and not using AI, they could easily clarify. The refusal to answer may suggest that transparency isn’t a priority, which can understandably make viewers feel skeptical.
As for the Soviet files he claims to provide on Telegram, while there’s certainly a wealth of conspiracy theories regarding Soviet UFO research, it’s essential to approach such claims with a critical eye. Often, solid evidence is required to back up extraordinary assertions.
Your skepticism is healthy, especially in a digital age where misinformation can spread easily. Engaging with others who have a similar interest can also help in dissecting what’s real and what’s not in channels like this. If you find evidence or seek out experts in AI or photography, they could offer additional insights into the authenticity of what A.W. Facts is presenting.