Throwback to Robert Bigelow’s Insights on Psionics and Our Species’ Progress
In a thought-provoking 2021 interview, Robert Bigelow made some striking statements regarding the nature of technology and our species’ current state. He emphasized the existence of advanced “machinery” that operates on a consciousness level—distinct from mere physical characteristics like fingerprints. Bigelow expressed frustration about humanity’s stagnant spiritual evolution, stating, “We’re a galactic embarrassment, still using fire engines,” highlighting how far behind we are technologically. He also mentioned that certain individuals are capable of macro psychokinesis.
Joe Murgia recently shared a clip from Bigelow’s interview on X, and it’s worth noting that the CIA once blocked the transfer of non-human intelligence (NHI) craft to Bigelow Aerospace—a controversial detail that adds layers to this discussion.
Bigelow’s Hesitant Testimony
When asked if he had ever witnessed such phenomena, Bigelow seemed visibly uncomfortable. He responded in a vague manner: “You don’t want to talk about stuff in case it happens in the future.” This suggests he may have firsthand experience but is constrained from discussing it, hinting at the possibility of future interactions with this advanced technology.
The Challenge of Understanding Alien Technology
Bigelow compared understanding extraterrestrial technology to owning just a fragment of a case that housed a cellphone. He explained that merely having a piece of advanced technology does not reveal its functionalities or the complex systems required for it to operate. The key issue he identified is our inability to reverse-engineer such technology, particularly because some of it might require a weightless environment for proper analysis.
Consciousness-Driven Machinery
Bigelow emphasized that the advanced machinery we might encounter is consciousness-driven, which sets it apart from earthly technology. He said, “We’re embarrassingly behind… I mean, we’re so far freaking behind, we really are,” pointing to a disconnect in our current educational system that fails to address these advanced concepts.
The Disconnect Between Spiritual and Technological Progress
Bigelow articulated concern over the lack of harmony between humanity’s spiritual and technological advancements. He noted that while our technological development is rapidly evolving, our spiritual growth appears stagnant. He expressed doubt that this intersection would occur anytime soon, stating, “I don’t see anything on the horizon… I can’t possibly foresee that.”
For further insights and analysis, you can check out the full post on X.
This is a thought-provoking post that captures an intriguing conversation about the intersections of technology, consciousness, and spirituality as articulated by Robert Bigelow. His reflections on psionics and advanced machinery, especially the idea that such machinery could be consciousness-driven, present a perspective that challenges our current understanding of both technology and human evolution.
Bigelow’s apparent discomfort when discussing his potential firsthand experiences with NHI (Non-Human Intelligence) technology raises questions about what he might know or have witnessed. It suggests he is treading carefully, perhaps to avoid revealing sensitive information, which adds a layer of intrigue to his statements.
The metaphor of owning a “sliver of a case that held a cellphone” is compelling. It speaks to the limitations of our understanding when we possess only minor pieces of a much larger puzzle. This reinforces the notion that advanced technologies may be far beyond our current capabilities and comprehension, especially if we lack the necessary context or supporting technologies to fully grasp their function.
Bigelow’s concerns about humanity’s stagnation in spiritual evolution juxtaposed with rapid technological advancement are particularly striking. It raises an essential dialogue about ensuring that as we develop new technologies, we also cultivate a corresponding growth in our ethical and spiritual understanding. Without this balance, we risk creating a future that could be technologically advanced but spiritually impoverished, leading to potential misuse of those advancements.
Ultimately, Bigelow’s insights call for a deeper exploration of how we view consciousness, technology, and our role in the cosmos. The suggestion that we may be missing crucial intersections between these fields is a reminder to expand our horizons and consider the broader implications of our advancements. It’s a fascinating dialogue that deserves further exploration and discussion.