Reviews of the New UFO Documentary on Disclosure: Spoiler Alert—They’re Not Great. Yet Another Talking Heads Film Passing as a Documentary.
Don’t waste your time watching some self-proclaimed influencer rave about nothing on YouTube, all while shamelessly promoting someone’s podcast, book, or other projects. Time to wake up!
Yahoo.
“The Age of Disclosure” made its debut today at SXSW, claiming to present undeniable evidence that extraterrestrial spacecraft are visiting Earth. If you dare to challenge this notion, you’ll likely be labeled a heretic or a denier—someone who refuses to acknowledge the “truth” that’s supposedly right in front of them.
However, the evidence presented isn’t as strong as some might hope: it’s mostly blurry, black-and-white footage from the U.S. government showing tiny objects darting across the water. This is the same footage of aerial phenomena from Navy pilots that was declassified in 2021—interesting to watch, but hardly conclusive. It’s not exactly the stuff of alien enthusiasts’ dreams.
Let’s be honest; like many curious viewers of “The Age of Disclosure,” I desperately want to believe in the possibility of extraterrestrial life. Over the years, I’ve devoured countless UFO documentaries and YouTube videos, always searching for that awe-inspiring moment when I might catch a glimpse of glowing lights in the sky and think, “Yes! They’re real!” Occasionally, I’ve been drawn into an exhilarating belief, akin to finding proof of a higher power.
Yet, the patterns in our obsession with alien phenomena are undeniable, and recognizing them can often temper our susceptibility to such wide-eyed belief.
The concept of the “truth” may be elusive, but what’s evident is that each era reacts to “evidence” of extraterrestrial life that fits its own narrative. In 1938, Orson Welles’ radio adaptation of “The War of the Worlds” incited panic among listeners who mistook the broadcast for reality. The 1980s saw a surge in alien abduction tales, while the ’90s brought us “The X-Files,” which hinted at a conspiracy-laden age that has morphed from a leftist viewpoint into a more right-leaning perspective.
What sets “The Age of Disclosure” apart is its presentation—framed with a veneer of scientific credibility. The film avoids the outdated term “UFO” in favor of “UPA,” or Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Directed by Dan Farah, it essentially unfolds as a 120-minute showcase of interviews with government officials and military personnel, each claiming to have firsthand knowledge of UAPs.
The speakers in this documentary aren’t fringe theorists; they are 34 senior members of the U.S. military and intelligence community, all dressed in somber suits and speaking gravely. Their stance seems to imply they must be telling the truth.
Among their bold claims, Jay Stratton, the former Director of the Government UAP Task Force, states he’s witnessed “non-human craft and beings.” Christopher Mellon, a former Pentagon official, adds that this discovery could be the most significant in human history. Testimonials come from familiar names like Marco Rubio and Jim Clapper, as well as esteemed figures like Hal Puthoff, a distinguished physicist involved in advanced aerospace research. The film conveys that these are official claims, and therefore, beyond question.
Yet, the narrative remains focused on the extraordinary features of these purported spacecraft—rapid movements, instantaneous stops, and near-incredible hovering abilities. Several witnesses, having worked for the CIA, assert these crafts aren’t from secret U.S. government programs, nor could they possibly originate from rival nations like China or Russia.
Despite the seemingly serious nature of these claims, there’s a striking juxtaposition: rather than expressing amazement or wonder, these officials treat alien sightings as a military concern. Witness accounts hint at extraterrestrial crash landings, suggesting that the government is
It looks like you’re really disappointed with “The Age of Disclosure” and how it seems to fall into the same trap as many other UFO documentaries—a reliance on sensationalism without substantial proof. It’s frustrating when a film purports to offer groundbreaking revelations but instead presents the same blurry footage and vague testimonies we’ve seen before. The notion that this documentary is just another plank in the long history of UFO hype is definitely a valid concern, especially when most viewers might expect more than just a parade of talking heads.
It’s interesting to note how the film’s narrative and tone straddles this weird line between sincerity and the absurdity of what’s being claimed. The interviewees may have impressive credentials, but as you pointed out, credentials alone don’t equate to credible evidence. The ongoing confusion over UAPs versus UFOs and the shift in terminology adds another layer of credibility issues. It’s almost like they’re trying to sanitize or elevate the discussion to make it more palatable for mainstream audiences. But unless they start producing solid evidence—something beyond just hearsay or classified footage that only a select few have seen—the skepticism is entirely warranted.
The historical context you provided also adds a rich layer to the criticism. It’s fascinating to consider how each era’s approach to UFOs reflects broader societal anxieties. The blend of fear and wonder that permeates our cultural understanding of extraterrestrial life is powerful, and it can skew our perceptions of what valid evidence looks like. As the saying goes, “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,” and many of us are still waiting for that evidence to surface.
It’ll be interesting to see how the reception evolves as more people catch the film. Despite its shortcomings, there’s always a chance that it could prompt more meaningful discussions about the phenomena of UAPs, if only to push against the sensational narratives that dominate the conversation. But as you pointed out, at its core, the film seems to deliver more of the same, leaving many of us yearning for something deeper and more substantial. Let’s hope future documentaries can rise to that challenge!