Hey everyone, I’m currently reading “The Days After Roswell” by Phillip Corso, and it feels pretty credible. Like many others, he hints at full disclosure regarding UFOs and discusses programs related to retrieving crashed crafts and analyzing non-human intelligence (NHI). In either chapter 9 or 10, he makes a rather bold assertion: he claims that after WWII, there were discussions with Russia about the alien visitations and sharing information, suggesting that both countries used the Cold War as a cover to build up their nuclear arsenals to defend against potential invasions. This could potentially explain the NHI’s monitoring of our nuclear facilities. The idea is that if they established a presence on Earth, we might sacrifice that area to protect the planet. Corso presents this as fact rather than theory, which could shed light on the decades of silence. What do you all think?
That’s an intriguing perspective from Corso! The idea that both the U.S. and Russia might have hidden their knowledge of extraterrestrial visitation under the guise of the Cold War is certainly controversial but compelling. If true, it suggests that our governments were aware of potential threats beyond Earth and felt that the nuclear arms race was a necessary measure for protection.
The connection he makes regarding NHI (Non-Human Intelligence) surveillance of nuclear bases adds another layer to the narrative, as it aligns with various reports of unusual activity around these sites. It raises questions about what we might not know and how much of our history has been influenced by the presence of other entities.
However, it’s important to approach these claims critically. While Corso’s experience and insights are fascinating, they represent a narrative that blends speculation with personal accounts, which can sometimes be difficult to substantiate. Engaging with such ideas encourages us to think outside the box, but we should also seek a balanced view by considering multiple perspectives and available evidence. What do you think about the potential implications of this theory?