Weird theories

Strange Theories on UFOs

Is it just me, or are there a growing number of bizarre theories surrounding UFOs lately?

There’s a faction forming that seems to think concepts like psionics or telepathy—essentially, the idea that our minds can connect with UFOs—are just way too far-fetched.

But honestly, when have there not been wild theories about UFOs?

To me, one of the most reasonable UFO theories ever proposed was the idea that “Martians are coming here out of fear of our nuclear weapons.” It was a logical hypothesis: Mars is a real planet with an atmosphere and seasons, not too far away, and our nuclear capabilities could pose a threat to them.

The downside? That theory turned out to be completely wrong—there are no canals on Mars, for starters.

The takeaway: just because a theory sounds logical and plausible doesn’t make it true, and counterintuitive theories aren’t automatically false. Logical theories are simply easier to corroborate with evidence, while evidence for theories that defy common sense is often elusive.

So, I reject the notion that “psionics,” which can refer to telepathy, remote viewing, or other abilities, is “too out there.” Discrediting ideas solely based on their implausibility is a fundamentally flawed approach to science.

I’ve personally experienced what felt like precognition twice during a college trip to Laguna Beach, California. While sitting on the beach at dawn, I thought to myself, “Someone will ride by on a horse.” Given how developed and enclosed Laguna Beach is, that seemed pretty unlikely. But just a few moments later, a rider on horseback passed by. Thinking that was odd, I got up to head back to my car and thought, “I’ll see someone from work.” And sure enough, minutes later, I ran into a colleague walking towards me.

Despite this, I don’t consider myself a “believer” in UFO-related psionics, especially regarding the claim of “summoning” or piloting UFOs, as I still await solid evidence.

This approach embodies skepticism: unless you have compelling reasons to adopt a belief, it’s wise to keep it at arm’s length without reaction.

In his lengthy interview, Barber mentions an emotional experience he felt was externally induced, which falls outside the current discussion on psionics. I’m open to the possibility of alien telepathy, physical paralysis, or other peculiar experiences, as there’s a wealth of historical evidence supporting these claims dating back to events like the Hill abduction. In fact, the UK MoD’s UAP report once suggested that some of these phenomena could be explained by microwave radiation.

The evidence connecting UFOs to mind-altering effects is actually more robust than that which supports the notion of “aliens” arriving in technologically advanced crafts from distant planets. Surprisingly, many in the UFO community still find the extraterrestrial hypothesis credible, even attributing it to aliens with warp drives motivated by our nuclear arsenal.

Regarding skepticism, it’s interesting how those critical of psionics often target the individuals discussing these topics as well. These “talking heads” are frequently labeled as being too far-fetched.

I maintain a healthy skepticism toward figures like Coulthart, Sheehan, and Michels. I don’t take them seriously when they present hearsay, which constitutes most of their claims. Science cannot rely on hearsay, and thus the information they provide is largely unhelpful to any scientific inquiry.

If any of their claims were substantiated, I’d be more open to listening. However, they often just shift their focus to new topics—remember the Nazca mummies? They prefer to follow trends rather than lead, as it requires less effort and poses less risk.

What I find most unscientific and unproductive in their conversations is the certainty they exude. This is particularly evident with Steven Greer. If you search for “Greer zero point energy,”