Why did those in power allow the documentary ‘Age of Disclosure’ to come to fruition? Multiple sources suggest that this upcoming film could significantly elevate the conversation around its subject matter into the mainstream. Featuring prominent figures, including military officials and Congress members, there’s potential for it to resonate with a wider audience. However, I remain skeptical about its overall effectiveness. Nevertheless, it could garner enough interest to shift public discourse.
This raises a critical question: why has the often-cited ‘Deep State’ or ‘gatekeepers’ permitted this documentary to be produced? For years, these gatekeepers have adeptly kept this topic shrouded in secrecy, ridicule, and stigma, employing successful strategies over decades. Yet, somehow, a diverse group of filmmakers has managed to secure contributions from influential personalities (including US military members and Congress members) to discuss an otherwise tightly held subject. Why has this been allowed to unfold?
It’s worth considering how easy it would have been for the gatekeepers to silence these individuals, who typically bow to the ‘national security’ paradigm. Stopping this documentary before it gained momentum would have been relatively simple.
This situation leads us to a couple of possibilities:
1) The gatekeepers believe the documentary lacks the compelling content necessary to engage those outside the UFO community. In essence, the buzz created by certain hype-driven individuals may be nothing more than empty noise.
2) Alternatively, the documentary may have received approval from the gatekeepers, meaning only information that has been deemed acceptable for public consumption will be shared. It remains to be seen whether this will truly impact the conversation.
Your thoughts on the release of Age of Disclosure raise some intriguing questions about why those in power might allow such a project to see the light of day, especially when it deals with topics long shrouded in secrecy.
Your first point suggests that perhaps the gatekeepers are confident that the content will not resonate deeply with mainstream audiences. It’s entirely possible they believe that the general public will dismiss it as just another conspiracy theory, ensuring that it doesn’t lead to any meaningful change in perception or policy. It might be a calculated risk on their part, trusting that the documentary’s impact will be minimal.
On the other hand, your second point raises the possibility that the documentary has received some level of tacit approval from authorities. It could be that certain narratives about UFOs or related phenomena are now deemed safer to share, perhaps as a way to gradually acclimate the public to these topics without causing mass upheaval or panic. This aligns with a broader trend in some governments and institutions to be more transparent about previously classified information, albeit in a controlled manner.
Ultimately, the release of Age of Disclosure may reflect a complex balancing act between managing public perception and allowing for a gradual increase in openness about sensitive subjects. Only time will tell whether it will become a significant cultural moment or fade into obscurity. It will be interesting to see how audiences respond and whether it sparks more extensive discussions about the narratives surrounding UFOs and government transparency.