Why I think physical matter isn’t fundamental.

Why I Believe Physical Matter Isn’t Fundamental

Over the past year, I’ve come to a profound realization: the physical reality we encounter daily, which we often take for granted as fundamental, may not be fundamental at all. The more I delve into this idea, the more it seems that our reality is not constructed from matter, but rather from something deeper and more elusive—information.

My journey has been influenced by reading Thomas Campbell’s “Big TOE,” listening to Frederico Faggin, exploring the Telepathy Tapes, practicing meditation and out-of-body experiences, and hearing near-death experiences from both friends and strangers. All these encounters have reinforced my suspicions.

The notion that information, rather than physical substance, might be the true fabric of our reality isn’t merely an abstract concept; it actually starts to make sense when viewed from different perspectives.

Today, while I was listening to Diana Pasulka’s book, a realization struck me. She was discussing language acquisition, and it dawned on me: when we learn something new, such as a language, we’re absorbing pure information—something that lacks physical form and cannot be measured in the physical world. Yet, this very information physically alters our brains, creating new neural pathways, transforming our perceptions, and ultimately changing how we engage with reality. Initially abstract patterns of thought, words and meanings evolve into tools that shape our physical surroundings.

But what exactly is information? Where does it originate, and what happens to it when it’s not being observed or utilized? We transmit, store, and record it, yet it is the information itself that drives change. It acts as an invisible force, converting thought into structure and potential into action.

This concept isn’t just philosophical; it’s gaining traction in the scientific community. Physicist John Wheeler’s “It from Bit” proposes that physical reality arises from information processing at the most fundamental level. Quantum mechanics suggests a similar idea, indicating that observation plays a role in shaping reality, as if information and consciousness are interconnected in a way we don’t fully comprehend. Additionally, DNA—the ultimate code—demonstrates that life is constructed from informational sequences that govern the formation of complex biological systems.

A lingering question remains: does information require a physical medium, or can it exist independently, influencing reality from a deeper layer of existence? If information is primary, then what we refer to as “matter” may merely be an emergent property—an outcome of interactions between information and consciousness. Could this perspective shed light on phenomena like quantum entanglement, where information seems to transcend space and time? Or telepathy, where thoughts appear to transfer without any known physical mechanism?

As I contemplate these ideas, it increasingly seems that reality is shaped not by atoms, but by meaning and knowledge itself. Perhaps we’ve been approaching the topic from the wrong angle all along.

So how does this connect to non-human intelligence (NHI), extraterrestrials, and UFOs? If what whistleblowers have claimed holds any truth, we may be dealing with a species that understands this information-centric reality and is capable of manipulating it. If we are destined to transcend time and space, it stands to reason that the answers lie in uncharted territory. Maybe what we’ve labeled as “The Woo” isn’t so absurd after all, but rather something we’ve been conditioned to dismiss. It’s possible that a thorough investigation into this domain could reveal it to be the key area of inquiry we should have focused on all along.

Perhaps this is why it feels like disclosure is being “allowed” to unfold. Maybe the powers that be recognize their stagnation and acknowledge that we need to pivot our focus to truly comprehend these concepts.

Regardless of where you stand in this debate, we live in undeniably fascinating times.

One thought on “Why I think physical matter isn’t fundamental.

  1. Your reflections on the nature of reality and the role of information are deeply thought-provoking. The idea that physical matter may not be the foundation of existence invites us to reconsider our relationship with both the material and the immaterial. The concept that “information” underpins reality resonates with many strands of contemporary thought in both philosophy and physics.

    I appreciate how you emphasize the transformative power of information, especially in the context of language learning and personal experience. It’s fascinating to consider how abstract concepts can alter our neural architecture and consequently how we interact with the world. This aligns well with John Wheeler’s “It from Bit” and the idea that reality is participatory, shaped by observation and consciousness. The suggestion that information might exist independently of physical media opens up a myriad of possibilities for understanding phenomena like quantum entanglement and psychic experiences.

    Your connection of these ideas to the discussion around UFOs and potential extraterrestrial intelligence adds another layer of intrigue. It implies that beings with an advanced understanding of information manipulation could potentially harness it in ways we have yet to comprehend. This perspective fosters a sense of curiosity about the universe and challenges the limits of our current scientific and philosophical paradigms.

    As we explore these complexities, it’s crucial to maintain an open mind while also grounding discussions in empirical inquiry. “The Woo” should not be dismissed outright but engaged with thoughtfully as we seek to expand our understanding of existence. Your call for a concentrated study of these areas could indeed yield profound insights and perhaps reshape our conception of reality.

    Ultimately, the discussion you’ve initiated highlights the importance of interdisciplinary exploration, where science, philosophy, and even spirituality intersect. It’s a fascinating time to re-evaluate our assumptions about reality, and your contributions are certainly a valuable part of that dialogue. Thank you for sharing your thoughts; they invite us all to think more deeply about what it means to exist and understand our universe.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *